2010
DOI: 10.2172/1054340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2009 Release of the Evaluated Nuclear Data Library (ENDL2009)

Abstract: LLNL's Computational Nuclear Physics Group and Nuclear Theory and Modeling Group have collaborated to produce the next iteration of LLNL's evaluated nuclear database ENDL2009. ENDL2009 is the second in a series of major ENDL library releases designed to support LLNL's current and future nuclear data needs. This library contains many new evaluations for radiochemical diagnostics, structural materials, and thermonuclear reactions. We have striven to keep ENDL2009 at the leading edge of nuclear data library devel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have simulated several foils ( 239 Pu, 233 U, 235 U, 238 U, 237 Np, 51 V, 55 Mn, 63 Cu, 93 Nb, 107 Ag, 121 Sb, 139 La, 193 Ir and 197 Au) which are tests of the (n, f ) and (n, γ) reactions in the Jezebel assembly. In all cases, our simulated values of the activation rates in these foils are either consistent with measured values or previous modeling using a modified version of the ENDF/B-VII.0 nuclear data library [54]. As the fission cross sections for 233 U, 235 U, 238 U, and 237 Np are accurately known and span all incident neutron energies, these tests merely confirm our earlier modeling of plutonium critical assemblies.…”
Section: F Validation Against Activation Ratiossupporting
confidence: 85%
“…We have simulated several foils ( 239 Pu, 233 U, 235 U, 238 U, 237 Np, 51 V, 55 Mn, 63 Cu, 93 Nb, 107 Ag, 121 Sb, 139 La, 193 Ir and 197 Au) which are tests of the (n, f ) and (n, γ) reactions in the Jezebel assembly. In all cases, our simulated values of the activation rates in these foils are either consistent with measured values or previous modeling using a modified version of the ENDF/B-VII.0 nuclear data library [54]. As the fission cross sections for 233 U, 235 U, 238 U, and 237 Np are accurately known and span all incident neutron energies, these tests merely confirm our earlier modeling of plutonium critical assemblies.…”
Section: F Validation Against Activation Ratiossupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Conversely, a well-characterized material can also be used to test the critical assembly flux modeling. We have simulated several foils ( 239 Pu, 233 U, 235 U, 238 U, 237 Np, 51 V, 55 Mn, 63 Cu, 93 Nb, 107 Ag, 121 Sb, 139 La, 193 Ir and 197 Au) which are tests of the (n, f ) and (n, γ) reactions in the Jezebel assembly. In all cases, our simulated values of the activation rates in these foils are either consistent with measured values or previous modeling using a modified version of the ENDF/B-VII.0 nuclear data library [55].…”
Section: B Validation Against Activation Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have simulated several foils ( 239 Pu, 233 U, 235 U, 238 U, 237 Np, 51 V, 55 Mn, 63 Cu, 93 Nb, 107 Ag, 121 Sb, 139 La, 193 Ir and 197 Au) which are tests of the (n, f ) and (n, γ) reactions in the Jezebel assembly. In all cases, our simulated values of the activation rates in these foils are either consistent with measured values or previous modeling using a modified version of the ENDF/B-VII.0 nuclear data library [55]. As the fission cross sections for 233 U, 235 U, 238 U, and 237 Np are accurately known and span all incident neutron energies, these tests merely confirm our earlier modeling of plutonium critical assemblies.…”
Section: B Validation Against Activation Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 99%