2011
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-11-11-2011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2010 Karakocan-Elazig earthquake and masonry structures

Abstract: Abstract.Karakocan-Elazig-Turkey earthquake with M = 6.0 occurred on 8 March 2010 at 04:32 a.m. (local time) in eastern Turkey and caused the loss of life and heavy damages, as well. The majority of the damaged structures were seismically deficient, unreinforced masonry buildings. In this paper, a site survey of the damaged buildings is presented and the reasons behind the damages are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Netherlands, the 1953 flooding disaster catalysed a shift in flood management from relying on historical metrics to focusing on future probability 52 . The Western Europe flood (2021) also renewed interest in resilience planning, especially for outlier events 53 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Netherlands, the 1953 flooding disaster catalysed a shift in flood management from relying on historical metrics to focusing on future probability 52 . The Western Europe flood (2021) also renewed interest in resilience planning, especially for outlier events 53 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survey of the damaged structures after earthquakes presents that most of them are seismically deficient, unreinforced masonry buildings. For example, as presented by Cetinkaya (2011), in the Karakocan, Elazig, Turkey earthquake, which occurred on 8 March 2010 in eastern Turkey, many people died, and heavy damage occurred due to the absence of bond beams at the top of walls coupled with the existence of heavy roofs constructed directly on the walls. These roofs led to a need for increased resistance to earthquakes, which result in multiple instances of damage.…”
Section: Floor Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The builder-owner uses low-strength materials such as adobe brick, clay brick, rubble stone, round timber logs, earth roof filling, and mud mortar; with the primary concern being cost, rather than seismic loads. Thus, these structures are generally built with no consideration paid to seismic resistant building details, but with many structural faults such as weak connections between elements, weak corner details, and heavy roofthin wall configuration [16,17,18]. As a consequence, these structures fail to resist even a mild earthquake and result in heavy damage or total collapse as seen in previous earthquakes, which prove the vulnerability of the built environment in the region.…”
Section: Geographical and Demographic Features Of The Van Provincementioning
confidence: 99%