2017
DOI: 10.7249/rr1783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2016 Assessment of the Civilian Acquisition Workforce Personnel Demonstration Project

Abstract: This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(The exception is NOAA-which had a larger share of women than men off grade in 2008 onlyand so women had a small pay advantage on average [.006 logged dollars] in that year.) These findings overall are consistent with a recent evaluation of a program in the Defense Department, in which off-grade employees had higher earnings and women were less likely to be hired off grade (Lewis et al 2017).…”
Section: Organizational Variation and Pay Gap Findingssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…(The exception is NOAA-which had a larger share of women than men off grade in 2008 onlyand so women had a small pay advantage on average [.006 logged dollars] in that year.) These findings overall are consistent with a recent evaluation of a program in the Defense Department, in which off-grade employees had higher earnings and women were less likely to be hired off grade (Lewis et al 2017).…”
Section: Organizational Variation and Pay Gap Findingssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The higher pay of pay-banded employees is notable, given that we found no statistical difference in retention between pay-banded and GS/GG cyber employees in series 854, 855, and 1550 (and no statistical difference in retention conditional on tenure for 854 and 1550). However, this result is consistent with prior analyses of the Civilian Acquisition Workforce Personnel Demonstration Project (AcqDemo), a demonstration project for a pay-banded pay plan in the acquisition community (Lewis et al, 2017).…”
Section: Paysupporting
confidence: 86%
“…All cyber employees in AcqDemo are assigned to the same pay-banded pay schedule (DoD, undated; see also 82 FR 52104 at DoD, 2017). Previous RAND research suggests that employees in AcqDemo have higher salaries but similar retention compared with GS/GG acquisition employees (Lewis et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Indeed, this hypothesis regarding the civilian General Schedule personnel system motivated the DoD Civilian Acquisition Workforce Personnel Demonstration Project (AcqDemo), which is an initiative beginning in 1999 to reengineer the civilian personnel systems with greater flexibility (e.g., tying a greater portion of pay to performance) to meet the needs of the acquisition workforce. Lewis et al (2016) indicates that, within AcqDemo, higher levels of contribution to the organizational mission were associated with higher salaries, more-rapid salary growth, more promotions, and a greater likelihood of retention, 157 but the perceived complexity of the project's evaluation system has been a long-standing concern. 158 Guo, Hall-Partyka, and Gates (2014), another RAND assessment of the acquisition workforce, illustrates that people who were in the AcqDemo project, or any demonstration pay plan, were retained longer than those in the General Schedule.…”
Section: Align Incentives With Desired Acquisition Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%