2017 Bilişim Teknolojileri ve Yazılım Dersi Öğretim Programının Ortaokul 5.sınıf Öğrencilerinin Görüşlerine Göre Değerlendirilmesi: Eskişehir İli Örneği

Gündüz, Gülten Feryal; Demir, Elif Buğra Kuzu

doi:10.24315/tred.735723

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Akıncı & Köse (2021) stated in their study that both the evaluated programs and program evaluation studies in Turkey have problems in serving their purpose. The small number of program evaluation studies conducted in Turkey has also been highlighted in some other research (Gündüz & Kuzu Demir, 2020;Keskin & Yazar, 2019). This situation may be an indicator that we should conduct more program evaluation studies that evaluate different program types and serve their purpose.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

“…Such studies are referred to as Pseudoevaluations because they are evaluations that express positive or negative opinions about the program, regardless of its actual benefit and value (Stufflebeam, 1999). Similarly, it has been emphasized in different studies that the number of program evaluation studies conducted in Turkey is limited (Gündüz & Kuzu Demir, 2020;Keskin & Yazar, 2019). This situation shows that more program evaluation studies should be conducted that evaluate different program types and serve their purpose.…”

Section: Conclusion Discussion and Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Eği̇ti̇mde Ölçme Ve Değerlendi̇rme Dersi̇ne Yöneli̇k Bi̇r Meta-Değerlendi̇rme Çalişmasi

Akıncı

Köse

2023

Trakya Eğitim Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study, it was aimed to make a meta-evaluation of the study titled Evaluation of Measurement and Evaluation in Education Curriculum. For this purpose, it was revealed to what extent the study meets the Program Evaluation Standards determined by the Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (JCSEE). Methodologically, meta-evaluation procedures were adopted in the research, and the Evaluation Accountability Standards determined by JCSEE were considered in the transactions carried out in this context. The Program Evaluation Standards Checklist developed by the researchers was used to control whether the meta-evaluated research met the required standards. For this purpose, controls were made by an internal and an external evaluator to reveal whether the study has the qualities of accurate planning, valid and reliable data collection, performing the necessary analyzes, and reporting which should be in an effective program evaluation research. According to the data obtained from internal and external evaluators, the meta-evaluated study largely (88.33%) meets the Program Evaluation Standards. In addition, according to both evaluators, Utility Standards were met by 88.9%, Feasibility Standards by 75%, and Accuracy Standards by 100%, while Propriety Standards are met at a rate of 87.5% according to the external evaluator and 75% according to the internal evaluator. Moreover, the experts are of the opinion that sufficient information was not provided in the research, especially about the concepts of cultural values, interests, contexts, and conflicts of interest. Based on the research findings, suggestions were made to conduct program evaluation and meta-evaluation studies more effectively.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Section: Conclusion Discussion and Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%