2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2009.11.214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

203: Comparison of Risk Factors and Outcomes for Pediatric Patients Listed for Heart Transplantation after Bidirectional Glenn and after Fontan: A Multi-Institutional Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These authors concluded that for selected high-risk single-ventricle patients, transplant should be considered as an alternative to Fontan completion (393). However, a recent large multi-center study from the Pediatric Heart Transplant Study group found similar outcomes for patients listed after bidirectional Glenn (n = 189) versus those transplanted after Fontan (n = 194); in this series, patients transplanted with Fontan who became ventilator dependent had poor survival (395). …”
Section: Stage III (Fontan Operation; Total Cavopulmonary Connection)mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…These authors concluded that for selected high-risk single-ventricle patients, transplant should be considered as an alternative to Fontan completion (393). However, a recent large multi-center study from the Pediatric Heart Transplant Study group found similar outcomes for patients listed after bidirectional Glenn (n = 189) versus those transplanted after Fontan (n = 194); in this series, patients transplanted with Fontan who became ventilator dependent had poor survival (395). …”
Section: Stage III (Fontan Operation; Total Cavopulmonary Connection)mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…11 Kovach and colleagues performed another multiinstitutional analysis in the PHTS to examine risk factors and outcomes for heart transplantation after Fontan versus those listed following the bidirectional Glenn stage of palliation. 14 This study was undertaken to examine the possibility that outcomes may be superior with listing after bidirectional Glenn for ''high-risk'' Fontan candidates because of the more stable physiology following Glenn, the presence of fewer prior surgical interventions, and the known increased risk of transplantation with acutely decompensating patients with a failing Fontan. Despite these theoretical concerns, survival after listing was similar and posttransplant survival was nearly identical (Figure 16).…”
Section: Posttransplant Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PHTS (2003-2008). Reproduced with permission from Kovach et al 14 PHTS indicates Pediatric Heart Transplant Study.…”
Section: Posttransplant Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%