2018
DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/aaef3b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

21 cm Signal Recovery via Robust Principal Component Analysis

Abstract: The redshifted 21 cm signal from neutral hydrogen (HI) is potentially a very powerful probe for cosmology, but a difficulty in its observation is that it is much weaker than foreground radiation from the Milky Way as well as extragalactic radio sources. The foreground radiation at different frequencies are however coherent along one line of sight, and various methods of foreground subtraction based on this property have been proposed. In this paper, we present a new method based on the Robust Principal Compone… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, Alonso et al (2015a) demonstrate how the leakage of polarised foregrounds can affect the cosmological analysis. Alternative, promising separation techniques have been proposed by Chapman et al (2013), Olivari, Remazeilles, & Dickinson (2016), Zhang et al (2016), Zuo et al (2018), which provide a diverse collection of techniques to tackle the foreground subtraction of the SKA data. Moreover, the overall effects of foreground residuals on the cosmological interpretation is dramatically reduced by combining IM data with optical galaxy surveys.…”
Section: Foregroundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Alonso et al (2015a) demonstrate how the leakage of polarised foregrounds can affect the cosmological analysis. Alternative, promising separation techniques have been proposed by Chapman et al (2013), Olivari, Remazeilles, & Dickinson (2016), Zhang et al (2016), Zuo et al (2018), which provide a diverse collection of techniques to tackle the foreground subtraction of the SKA data. Moreover, the overall effects of foreground residuals on the cosmological interpretation is dramatically reduced by combining IM data with optical galaxy surveys.…”
Section: Foregroundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These foregrounds are orders of magnitude brighter than the cosmological signal, but fortunately, their spectral structure is basically smooth, so we can use some cleaning algorithms to remove them (e.g., Refs. [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53]). In this work, we simply assume that some sort of cleaning algorithm has been applied, leaving behind some residual foreground…”
Section: Foreground Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, the spectral structure of the foreground sources is basically smooth, so we can use some cleaning algorithms to suppress them to a level that the cosmological H i signal can be extracted in an unbiased way (e.g., Refs. [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53]). Even so, there will be some foreground contamination left.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These includes the Global Sky Model (GSM) (de Oliveira-Costa et al 2008), its improvements (Danny C. Price 2016;Zheng et al 2017;Sathyanarayana Rao et al 2017;Kim et al 2018), and the Self-consistent Sky Model (SSM) (Huang et al 2019). They are very useful in the design of new instruments, study of observation strategies, and testing foreground removal/mitigation methods (e.g., Shaw et al 2014;Zuo et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%