2004
DOI: 10.1097/00008390-200408000-00037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

21 Randomized assessment of strategies for self-detection in the general population: failure of ABCD, success of cognitive approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These features were then used to train an SVM for classification with feature selection [13]. However, the ABCDE criteria are not the best features to use for melanoma detection [14]. Moreover, these features are assimilated to low-level features in CAD systems, which can limit the overall accuracy of the CADs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These features were then used to train an SVM for classification with feature selection [13]. However, the ABCDE criteria are not the best features to use for melanoma detection [14]. Moreover, these features are assimilated to low-level features in CAD systems, which can limit the overall accuracy of the CADs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has already been suggested that the melanoma detection process used by dermatologists is not based on an analytical process, such as an ABCD algorithm, but rather on a more global cognitive assessment (Girardi et al, 2004(Girardi et al, , 2006.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%