2108. Comparison of Voriconazole vs. Itraconazole in the Treatment of Histoplasmosis – A Retrospective Analysis

Abstract

BackgroundThe guideline-preferred azole for histoplasmosis (HP) is itraconazole (IC). While voriconazole (VC) has shown success in in-vitro and in retrospective analyses, there has not been enough data to include newer generation azoles as first-line treatment for infections with Histoplasma capsulatum.MethodsWe conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of adult patients diagnosed with HP from 2002 through 2017. Data included demographics, clinical features and sites of infection, immune status, treatments, and mortality. Patients were categorized into two groups based on initial choice of azole (IC or VC) and mortality was compared between these two groups. The treatment groups were defined based on the first azole received, either IC or VC, as initial or as step-down therapy from amphotericin. Patients initiated on other azoles were excluded.ResultsWe identified 263 cases of HP from 2002 to 2017. After excluding patients initiated on other azoles, 194 patients remained. 175 (90%) patients were started on IC and 19 (10%) were started on VC, either as stepdown or initial choice of antifungal. There were no significant demographic differences between patients receiving IC compared with VC as their initial azole treatment. Patients with hematologic malignancies tended to be prescribed VC more frequently but this was not statistically significant (OR 3.1 [0.77–12.4]). Death occurred in 40 (23%) patients from the IC and 5 (26%) patients from the VC group. The hazard ratio for mortality with the use of VC was 1.21 (CI 0.4–3.6, P = 0.73).ConclusionIC is the mainstay in the treatment for HP. It appears that VC has comparable outcomes to IC and can be considered an alternative treatment option for HP, at least for patients with contraindications to IC treatment. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.