2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.10.440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

220P A cost-effectiveness analysis of systemic therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer

Abstract: Results: One (3.2%), 6 (19.4%), 9 (29.0%) and 10 (32.3%) were defined as NCCN low-(LR), intermediate-(IR), high-(HR) and very high-risk (VHR), respectively; 5 (16.1%) presented with M1 at diagnosis. The 22-gene GC classified one (3.2%), 7 (22.6%) and 23 (74.2%) as LR (<0.45), IR (0.45-0.6) and HR (>0.6), [hp2] [AS3] respectively. All M1 PCa patients harbored high GC scores (range 0.796-0.955). Of the 9 NCCN HR patients, 5 (55.6%) were downgraded to GC-IR; while the VHR patients were not affected. For the 6 NCC… Show more

Help me understand this report

This publication either has no citations yet, or we are still processing them

Set email alert for when this publication receives citations?

See others like this or search for similar articles