2022
DOI: 10.1016/s0969-8051(22)00330-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

223Ra-radiolabeling: predicting stability using molecular modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before experimental results are reported, the equilibrium constant was determined for the metal exchange reaction (8) using the ωB97X, M08-HX and MN15 functionals: 26 Ra(macropa) + Ba 2+ → Ba(macropa) + Ra 2+ Although macropa showed a tendency for binding to large over small ions, which was confirmed for alkaline-earth ions up to barium, 65 the results for radium establish a divergence for the larger ions. Indeed, the affinity of deprotonated macropa 2− for Ra 2+ was determined significantly weaker than that for Ba 2+ .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Before experimental results are reported, the equilibrium constant was determined for the metal exchange reaction (8) using the ωB97X, M08-HX and MN15 functionals: 26 Ra(macropa) + Ba 2+ → Ba(macropa) + Ra 2+ Although macropa showed a tendency for binding to large over small ions, which was confirmed for alkaline-earth ions up to barium, 65 the results for radium establish a divergence for the larger ions. Indeed, the affinity of deprotonated macropa 2− for Ra 2+ was determined significantly weaker than that for Ba 2+ .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the affinity of deprotonated macropa 2− for Ra 2+ was determined significantly weaker than that for Ba 2+ . 26 The calculated values of the equilibrium constant, with n varied by up to 3, are presented in Table 10. According to the number of water molecules used to cluster the Ra( ii ) and Ba( ii ) complexes, the mean value of log K exc varies between 0.9 and 2.1, i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations