2020
DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

230 days of ultra long‐term subcutaneous EEG: seizure cycle analysis and comparison to patient diary

Abstract: We describe the longest period of subcutaneous EEG (sqEEG) monitoring to date, in a 35‐year‐old female with refractory epilepsy. Over 230 days, 4791/5520 h of sqEEG were recorded (86%, mean 20.8 [IQR 3.9] hours/day). Using an electronic diary, the patient reported 22 seizures, while automatically‐assisted visual sqEEG review detected 32 seizures. There was substantial agreement between days of reported and recorded seizures (Cohen’s kappa 0.664), although multiple clustered seizures remained undocumented. Circ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
61
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, subjects’ behavior might change throughout the time of the study, with subjects becoming more active after having recovered from the implantation procedure. Third, long‐term cyclical changes in brain activity have been described; in particular, spike rates and seizure rates have been shown to vary both at circadian but also at multi‐day timescales 32–34 . This could also be reflected in frequency band activity, or indirectly in patients’ behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, subjects’ behavior might change throughout the time of the study, with subjects becoming more active after having recovered from the implantation procedure. Third, long‐term cyclical changes in brain activity have been described; in particular, spike rates and seizure rates have been shown to vary both at circadian but also at multi‐day timescales 32–34 . This could also be reflected in frequency band activity, or indirectly in patients’ behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance average rates of interictal epileptic activity ( 4 ), the variance and autocorrelation of EEG ( 15 ), and even average heart rate ( 21 ) all show multiday cycles that are more robustly predictive of seizure likelihood than looking at past seizure times. Additionally, a recent comparison of seizure diaries and epileptic activity captured from chronic sub-scalp recording systems ( 22 ) showed discrepancies between the cyclic distributions of self-reported and electrographic events, even when diaries were relatively accurate ( 23 ). This is perhaps not unexpected given many seizures are not recognised by patients, particularly those occurring in sleep.…”
Section: Misconception 1: Seizure Diaries Are Too Noisy To Infer Cyclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although overlapping symptomatically, this fundamental difference in generalised seizure generation may mean that electrographic multiday cycles are not present in generalised epilepsies due to the difference in the seizure generation process. We anticipate that the next generation of chronic EEG devices ( 23 , 28 , 63 ) will be able to elucidate any such cycles as they have for focal epilepsies.…”
Section: Misconception 5: Cycles Are Only Relevant For Focal Epilepsiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Invasive intracranial systems, such as the RNS System (NeuroPace) and the Percept PC (Medtronic), are available but are built for neurostimulation, do not store sufficient data and are too invasive for diagnostic applications (19). Alternatively, sub-scalp EEG systems are minimally-invasive tools that may address the need for objective ultra-long term EEG recordings (19,20), allowing for personalised and accurate epilepsy management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This case study demonstrates how cycles can be derived from events in the EEG and in turn, these cycles can be used to forecast epileptic seizures. The forecasting method has been built on previous work in seizure cycles (20,(29)(30)(31) and interictal EA cycles (17,18,32).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%