2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.quageo.2015.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

230Th/U-dating of carbonate deposits from ancient aqueducts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Growth rates are typically ~1 mm per year for such deposits (Wenz et al . ). The growth rates of PTC1 and MDA are thus on the low side of the reported growth rate for aqueduct deposits, but still within the range of the given values, making the 12‐year period plausible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Growth rates are typically ~1 mm per year for such deposits (Wenz et al . ). The growth rates of PTC1 and MDA are thus on the low side of the reported growth rate for aqueduct deposits, but still within the range of the given values, making the 12‐year period plausible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The U/Th dating method (Frank et al, 2002; Pentecost, 2005, p. 249) is the most directly applicable to carbonate and has been successfully applied in some water systems (Claude et al, forthcoming; Frumkin et al, 2003; Passchier, Sürmelihindi, Spötl, Mertz‐Kraus, et al, 2016; Pons‐Branchu et al, 2018). Aqueducts, however, commonly contain clay and other detrital particles in sub‐microscopic particles, which contain 230 Th (initial Th) which significantly increases the error of the method (Wenz et al, 2016). Dating is therefore presently best attempted in white, sparitic translucent aqueduct carbonate with low clay content and high 234 U levels.…”
Section: Dating Of Carbonate Depositsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thorium correction is often crucial for studying carbonates where the correction is significant, but the initial 230 Th value is unknown, potentially variable, or when studying "dirty" carbonates such as tufa and travertine (Mallick and Frank, 2002;Hellstrom, 2006;Wenz et al, 2016). Several studies have shown that this correction particularly important for speleothem records from the Caribbean and Central American region, where values where found including 2 ± 1 (Schorndorf et al, 2023) or 14 ± 4 (Moseley et al, 2015).…”
Section: Detrital Thorium Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%