24 Hours in a Day: A Listening Update to the Time Studies

Janusik, Laura A.; Wolvin, Andrew D.

doi:10.1080/10904010903014442

Cited by 15 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, data on the amount of time teens and young adults spend in these pursuits are thin, often based on small samples (Hanson et al, 2010;Janusik & Wolvin, 2009;Kayany & Yelsma, 2000;Lauricella et al, 2014), over relatively brief time-spans (Hall, Kearney, & Xing, 2018), collected primarily for market research (GfK, 2014;JWT, 2012;Newell, Genschel, & Zhang, 2014), on only one type of media (Lenhart et al, 2015;Twenge & Park, 2018), or not updated every year (Common Sense Media, 2015), leading to outdated information (Rideout et al, 2010). Moreover, few studies track media use over the years among the same age-group using the same questions.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In recent years, adolescents have engaged more and more with technology, spending hours online, on social media, texting, and gaming on electronic devices including smartphones and tablets (Lauricella, Cingel, Blackwell, Wartella, & Conway, 2014; Perrin, 2015; Rideout et al, 2010), activities that we define as “digital media.” As generations become more digitally native, their comfort level with (Van Volkom, Stapley, & Malter, 2013) and use of (Taipale, 2016; van den Berg, Arentze, & Timmermans, 2012) digital media increase relative to that of previous generations. However, data on the amount of time teens and young adults spend in these pursuits are thin, often based on small samples (Hanson et al, 2010; Janusik & Wolvin, 2009; Kayany & Yelsma, 2000; Lauricella et al, 2014), over relatively brief time-spans (Hall, Kearney, & Xing, 2018), collected primarily for market research (GfK, 2014; JWT, 2012; Newell, Genschel, & Zhang, 2014), on only one type of media (Lenhart et al, 2015; Twenge & Park, 2018), or not updated every year (Common Sense Media, 2015), leading to outdated information (Rideout et al, 2010). Moreover, few studies track media use over the years among the same age-group using the same questions.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Trends in U.S. Adolescents’ media use, 1976–2016: The rise of digital media, the decline of TV, and the (near) demise of print.

Twenge¹,

Martin²,

Spitzberg³

2019

Psychology of Popular Media Culture

457

274

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Studies have produced conflicting results about whether digital media (the Internet, texting, social media, and gaming) displace or complement use of older legacy media (print media such as books, magazines, and newspapers; TV; and movies). Here, we examine generational/time period trends in media use in nationally representative samples of 8th, 10th, and 12th graders in the United States, 1976 -2016 (N ϭ 1,021,209; 51% female). Digital media use has increased considerably, with the average 12th grader in 2016 spending more than twice as much time online as in 2006, and with time online, texting, and on social media totaling to about 6 hr a day by 2016. Whereas only half of 12th graders visited social media sites almost every day in 2008, 82% did by 2016. At the same time, iGen adolescents in the 2010s spent significantly less time on print media, TV, or movies compared with adolescents in previous decades. The percentage of 12th graders who read a book or a magazine every day declined from 60% in the late 1970s to 16% by 2016, and 8th graders spent almost an hour less time watching TV in 2016 compared with the early 1990s. Trends were fairly uniform across gender, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. The rapid adoption of digital media since the 2000s has displaced the consumption of legacy media. Public Policy Relevance StatementCompared with previous generations of teens, iGen teens in the 2010s spend more time online and less time with older media such as books, magazines, and TV. Time on digital media appears to have displaced time once spent reading and watching TV.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Trends in U.S. Adolescents’ media use, 1976–2016: The rise of digital media, the decline of TV, and the (near) demise of print.

Twenge¹,

Martin²,

Spitzberg³

2019

Psychology of Popular Media Culture

457

274

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We focused on storytelling as a typical activity since teachers spend more than half of their class time on verbal instruction from elementary school to college school in different countries (Janusik and Wolvin, 2009 ) and it is often used as a teaching tool for organizational learning and received wisdom (Haigh and Hardy, 2011 ). Storytelling in elementary schools is usually done in one-to-many communication; a storyteller reads a picture book to many children, while Hugvie is used in one-to-one interactive communication (e.g., Minato et al, 2013 ; Sumioka et al, 2013 ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of Mediated Intimate Interaction on Education: A Huggable Communication Medium that Encourages Listening

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, we propose the introduction of human-like communication media as a proxy for teachers to support the listening of children in school education. Three case studies are presented on storytime fieldwork for children using our huggable communication medium called Hugvie, through which children are encouraged to concentrate on listening by intimate interaction between children and storytellers. We investigate the effect of Hugvie on children's listening and how they and their teachers react to it through observations and interviews. Our results suggest that Hugvie increased the number of children who concentrated on listening to a story and was welcomed by almost all the children and educators. We also discuss improvement and research issues to introduce huggable communication media into classrooms, potential applications, and their contributions to other education situations through improved listening.

show abstract

“…Multi-tasking in general, and media multi-tasking (also referred to as simultaneous media use) in particular, has been a part of the media experience for many years (McDonald & Meng, 2009) but has only recently gotten much research attention (Janusik & Wolvin, 2009;Jeong, Hwang, & Fishbein, 2010;Nielsen, 2010a). While time spent typically has been seen as an indicator of attention, the very idea of multitasking makes it clear that attention is not equivalent to time.…”

Section: Media Multi-taskingmentioning

confidence: 98%