2019
DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2456. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (SM) Pseudo-outbreak Associated with Bronchoscope

Abstract: BackgroundStenotrophomonas maltophilia (SM) is a multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative organism that typically impacts patients with long hospital stays or severe immunocompromise. In Q4 2017, an increase in rates of SM from adult bronchoscopic alveolar lavage (BAL) specimens was detected.MethodsThe charts of all patients with SM from BAL specimens during the time frame in question were reviewed for commonalities, clinical symptoms and antibiotic treatment for Stenotrophomonas. Incidence rate ratios for the 21 mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, our cohort stands apart from other outbreak scenarios due to several factors: (1) All patients with S. maltophilia infection developed respiratory colonization with or without nosocomial pneumonia, with no cases of bacteremia; (2) no diagnostic or therapeutic material was found to be contaminated [35,36]; (3) a single principal ST was found to be the culprit of the outbreak [37]; and (4) our investigation did not find evidence of polymicrobial colonization or infection from bronchoaspiration samples [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…On the other hand, our cohort stands apart from other outbreak scenarios due to several factors: (1) All patients with S. maltophilia infection developed respiratory colonization with or without nosocomial pneumonia, with no cases of bacteremia; (2) no diagnostic or therapeutic material was found to be contaminated [35,36]; (3) a single principal ST was found to be the culprit of the outbreak [37]; and (4) our investigation did not find evidence of polymicrobial colonization or infection from bronchoaspiration samples [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%