Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-associated colorectal cancer (CRC) is a severe and well-known complication of long-standing IBD affecting the colon (1). The risk factors of CRC in IBD are well established and include primary sclerosing cholangitis, young age of IBD onset, continuing active inflammation, extensive colitis and/or scarred tubular colon, family history of CRC, or prior detected colonic dysplasia. More recently, population-based studies report a decreasing risk of CRC in IBD over the past decade, which is probably multifactorial because of improved medical therapies and well-established guidelines for CRC screening in the IBD patient population (2). Current national or societal guidelines generally recommend starting surveillance 8 years after diagnosis of left-sided or pancolitis or in Crohn's disease with involvement of more than one-third of the colon. The options for the diagnostic technical aspect of the colonoscopic approach are standard white light endoscopy or high-definition white light endoscopy (HD-WLE). In addition, for contrast enhancement during the examination, dye spraying chromoendoscopy (DCE) using either methylene blue or indigo carmine or different technologies for virtual chromoendoscopy (VCE), including imaging modalities such as narrow-band imaging, I-scan chromo colonoscopy, and Fuji intelligent enhancement chromoendoscopy, are available (3). However, despite numerous studies, there is no universal agreement in the current literature and guidelines on the best technological modality and the question of random vs targeted biopsies in the context of the chosen modality (4).Four meta-analyses, all published in 2019 and 2020, compared selected colonoscopic modalities and the yield of dysplastic lesions during surveillance colonoscopy. The findings were consistent, showing a significant advantage of dysplasia detection when using HD-WLE, DCE, or VCE compared with standard white light endoscopy (5-8). Nonetheless, the available analyses did not resolve whether DCE is equal to or better than HD-WLE. Feuerstein et al (8) found in their metaanalysis in nonrandomized clinical trials a benefit of DCE over HD-WLE, but this effect was not seen in the small number of available randomized studies. Similarly, the meta-analysis of Resende et al (5) reported no significant difference in dysplasia detection between DCE and HD-WLE. By contrast, Wan et al (7) described a small benefit of DCE compared with HD-WLE.Meta-analyses and systematic reviews have a limited time span, and regular updates are necessary when quantitative or