2022 IEEE International Solid- State Circuits Conference (ISSCC) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/isscc42614.2022.9731706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

26.2 Design Considerations for Superconducting Quantum Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…limitations, whereas extending a 2-qubit to a 100-qubit experiment may be unfeasible due to cost and size. This has led to ad hoc designs [193,194].…”
Section: Cryogenic Vs Rt Electronicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…limitations, whereas extending a 2-qubit to a 100-qubit experiment may be unfeasible due to cost and size. This has led to ad hoc designs [193,194].…”
Section: Cryogenic Vs Rt Electronicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, individual control of each qubit frequency through a static Z-bias current allows for qubit idling frequencies to be optimized for maximum T 1 , which is an important feature that allows for one to avoid the detrimental effects of parasitic two-level systems, which can introduce loss at unpredictable (and time-varying) frequencies [102]. Secondly, dynamic control of the qubit frequency can be used for a variety of purposes such as phase 1 Typical values of T 1 for a frequency tunable transmon in a large processor are ≈ 20 µs [3]. The lower numbers in comparison to fixed frequency transmons are partially related to the extra Z tuning port.…”
Section: B Superconducting Circuit Based Quantum Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early proofof-principle systems have generally employed laboratorygrade hardware for control and measurement. For instance, today's state-of-the-art quantum computers-which contain on the order of 100 qubits-employ rack-mount electronics implemented using commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) components for generation and digitization of the control and readout signals, respectively (e.g., [1], [2]). This approach has been justified as the field of quantum computing is still in the proof-of-concept phase, where architectures are rapidly evolving and the basic principles required for practical faulttolerant quantum computing are still being verified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential on each side of this resistor can be measured via an on-chip analog monitor bus, enabling off-line calibration of the individual sub-DACs. 6 The second switch serves as a polarity switch, enabling the routing of the current to a positive or negative output port.…”
Section: A Xy Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the many areas requiring attention, here, we focus on control of the quantum processor. For today's O(100) qubit superconducting quantum computers, the necessary control waveforms are generated using custom-built rack-mounted electronic control systems that leverage high-speed digitalto-analog converters (DACs) driven from field-programmable gate array (FPGA)-based interfaces [6], [7]; this approach has been logical due to the fact that system development to date has focused primarily on basic demonstrations and, as such, the optimization of electronics has not been critical. However, realization of the O(10 6 ) qubit systems currently believed necessary for fault-tolerant quantum computing will require reducing the size, power, and cost of these electronic interfaces.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%