2011
DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.02.267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

264 Validation of the Kidney Disease Quality of Life 36 (KDQOL-36) U.S. Spanish and English Versions in Hispanics with Chronic Kidney Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
1
8

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
57
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that the evidence for this measure was obtained from studies conducted in Taiwanese patients [33], and a combination of Hispanic and non-Hispanic white patients [34]. Furthermore, the measurement properties were not reported by CKD stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the evidence for this measure was obtained from studies conducted in Taiwanese patients [33], and a combination of Hispanic and non-Hispanic white patients [34]. Furthermore, the measurement properties were not reported by CKD stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scores on each scale range from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting better quality of life. Finally, the single‐item overall health rating item allows subjects to rate health on a 0–10 response scale ranging from “worst possible” to “best possible health.” The KDQOL‐SF English version has been validated in Mexican Americans with chronic kidney disease and a Spanish version recently among Mexicans on HD .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kidney disease quality of life (KDQOL™-36) instrument, previously validated in populations of undocumented Hispanic patients, 6 was selected as the second survey and was used to obtain HRQoL data from our study population. Responses to the KDQOL-36 were used to calculate scores for 5 unique subscales for each patient: physical health component summary (PCS); mental health component summary (MCS); burden of kidney disease; symptoms of kidney disease; and effects of kidney disease Wisconsin, USA) electronic medical record as they checked into the ED requesting dialysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While we drew comparisons from the literature, we did not survey a matched control population. Additionally, using the KDQOL-36 instrument, selected for its validity in surveying ESRD patients, 6 limited the number of previously surveyed populations against which our data could be compared. This meant that while the PCS and MCS scores generated for our population using the KDQOL-36 could be directly compared with scores from other published studies that utilized different versions the KDQOL instrument, 7 the three remaining KDQOL-36 subscales scores for our population could only be interpreted qualitatively.…”
Section: Quality Of Life In Emergent Dialysis -Hogan Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%