“…With regard to attitudes, we adopted Eagly and Chaiken’s (1993) and Ajzen’s (2001) classical approach, according to which, attitude is generally understood as a psychological tendency that is expressed through evaluation of a particular entity as good or bad, likable or dislikable, or through a view of it with some degree of favor or disfavor. To explore the extent to which students’ attitudes were individualized or traditional regarding (some) family issues, we asked them to express their level of agreement with statements about various topics about family that, based on the existing literature, we consider pivotal in capturing the students’ attitudes about the family: marital choices, sexuality and childbearing, place of residence, and domestic violence (Abu-Baker, 2012, 2016; Fogiel-Bijaoui, 2002, 2016a; Fogiel-Bijaoui & Bechar, 2003; Haj-Yahia & Lavee, 2017; Halperin, 2013, 2015; Lavee & Katz, 2003; Meler, 2016, 2017; Zaatut & Haj-Yahia, 2016). The statements referring to marital choices, sexuality and childbearing, and place of residence were already used in a previous study conducted among (Jewish and Muslim) education students (Fogiel-Bijaoui & Bechar, 2003).…”