27. Patient-reported Outcomes on Subjective Nipple Sensation following Double-incision and Periareolar Mastectomy for Chest Masculinization
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Cited by 1 publication
References 0 publications
Targeted Reinnervation During Gender-Affirming Mastectomy and Restoration of Sensation
ImportanceDuring gender-affirming mastectomy, nerves are transected, resulting in sensory loss. Nerve preservation using targeted nipple-areola complex (NAC) reinnervation (TNR) may restore sensation.ObjectiveTo determine the quantitative and patient-reported sensory outcomes of TNR.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsProspective matched cohort study of patients undergoing gender-affirming mastectomy from August 2021 to December 2022 at Weill Cornell Medicine and Massachusetts General Hospital. Data were analyzed from January to March 2023.ExposurePatients who underwent TNR and matched patients who did not.Main Outcomes and MeasuresMechanical detection measured with monofilaments and patient-reported outcome questionnaires were completed preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. Additional quantitative sensory testing was performed preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively. The primary outcome was mechanical detection while secondary outcomes were the additional quantitative sensory testing variables and patient-reported outcomes. Exclusion criteria included peripheral nerve disorders, unmatched patients, and incomplete follow-up.ResultsA total of 25 patients who underwent TNR and 25 matched patients who did not were included. The mean (SD) age was 24.9 (5.5) years, BMI was 26.6 (5.2), and mastectomy weight was 608.9 (326.5) g; 6 patients (12.0%) were Asian, 5 patients (10.0%) were Black or African American, and 33 patients (66.0%) were White. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that the outcomes of TNR on improving mechanical detection over time was significant at the NAC (F = 35.2; P < .001) and chest (F = 4.2; P = .045). At 12 months, mean quantitative sensory values in patients who underwent TNR reached baseline and were improved compared with patients who did not undergo TNR for monofilaments (mean [SD] NAC, 3.7 [0.5] vs 4.9 [0.9]; [data]; P < .001; chest, 3.3 [0.4] vs 3.6 [0.6]; [data]; P = .002), vibration (mean [SD] NAC, 7.7 [ 0.4] vs 7.3 [0.4]; t96 = 6.3; P < .001; chest, 7.8 [0.3] vs 7.5 [0.3]; t96 = 5.1; P < .001), 2-point discrimination (NAC, 40% vs 0%; r = 20; P = .02); chest, 4.1 [1.2] cm vs 5.7 [1.8] cm; P < .001), pinprick (mean [SD] NAC, 24.9 [21.2] mN vs 82.6 [96.7] mN; t98 = 4.1; P < .001; chest, 22.5 [25.6] mN vs 54.1 [45.4] mN; t98 = 4.6; P < .001), cold (mean [SD] NAC, 23.1 [4.7] °C vs 12.0 [7.6] °C; t98 = 8.8; P < .001; chest, 23.6 [3.1] °C vs 19.7 [5.6] °C; t98 = 4.4; P < .001), warm (mean [SD] NAC, 39.9 [5.0] °C vs 45.8 [4.2] °C; t98 = 6.3; P < .001; chest, 39.4 [3.1] °C vs 42.9 [4.0] °C; t98 = 4.9; P < .001), and pressure pain detection (mean [SD] NAC, 89.9 [45.6] kPa vs 130.5 [68.9] kPa; t86 = 3.9; P < .001; chest, 128.5 [38.0] kPa vs 175.5 [49.3] kPa; t96 = 4.0; P = .001). ANOVA demonstrated that TNR significantly improved patient-reported nipple sensation (F = 60.5; P < .001), chest light touch (F = 8.1; P = .01) and erogenous sensation (F = 8.3; P = .01). Significantly more patients who underwent TNR than those who did not reported nipple hypersensitivity until 3 months postoperatively (8% vs 4% at 12 months).Conclusion and RelevanceIn this prospective matched cohort study, TNR was associated with improved quantitative and patient-reported sensation. Patients should be counseled about the risk of transient NAC hypersensitivity.
Targeted Reinnervation During Gender-Affirming Mastectomy and Restoration of Sensation
ImportanceDuring gender-affirming mastectomy, nerves are transected, resulting in sensory loss. Nerve preservation using targeted nipple-areola complex (NAC) reinnervation (TNR) may restore sensation.ObjectiveTo determine the quantitative and patient-reported sensory outcomes of TNR.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsProspective matched cohort study of patients undergoing gender-affirming mastectomy from August 2021 to December 2022 at Weill Cornell Medicine and Massachusetts General Hospital. Data were analyzed from January to March 2023.ExposurePatients who underwent TNR and matched patients who did not.Main Outcomes and MeasuresMechanical detection measured with monofilaments and patient-reported outcome questionnaires were completed preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. Additional quantitative sensory testing was performed preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively. The primary outcome was mechanical detection while secondary outcomes were the additional quantitative sensory testing variables and patient-reported outcomes. Exclusion criteria included peripheral nerve disorders, unmatched patients, and incomplete follow-up.ResultsA total of 25 patients who underwent TNR and 25 matched patients who did not were included. The mean (SD) age was 24.9 (5.5) years, BMI was 26.6 (5.2), and mastectomy weight was 608.9 (326.5) g; 6 patients (12.0%) were Asian, 5 patients (10.0%) were Black or African American, and 33 patients (66.0%) were White. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that the outcomes of TNR on improving mechanical detection over time was significant at the NAC (F = 35.2; P < .001) and chest (F = 4.2; P = .045). At 12 months, mean quantitative sensory values in patients who underwent TNR reached baseline and were improved compared with patients who did not undergo TNR for monofilaments (mean [SD] NAC, 3.7 [0.5] vs 4.9 [0.9]; [data]; P < .001; chest, 3.3 [0.4] vs 3.6 [0.6]; [data]; P = .002), vibration (mean [SD] NAC, 7.7 [ 0.4] vs 7.3 [0.4]; t96 = 6.3; P < .001; chest, 7.8 [0.3] vs 7.5 [0.3]; t96 = 5.1; P < .001), 2-point discrimination (NAC, 40% vs 0%; r = 20; P = .02); chest, 4.1 [1.2] cm vs 5.7 [1.8] cm; P < .001), pinprick (mean [SD] NAC, 24.9 [21.2] mN vs 82.6 [96.7] mN; t98 = 4.1; P < .001; chest, 22.5 [25.6] mN vs 54.1 [45.4] mN; t98 = 4.6; P < .001), cold (mean [SD] NAC, 23.1 [4.7] °C vs 12.0 [7.6] °C; t98 = 8.8; P < .001; chest, 23.6 [3.1] °C vs 19.7 [5.6] °C; t98 = 4.4; P < .001), warm (mean [SD] NAC, 39.9 [5.0] °C vs 45.8 [4.2] °C; t98 = 6.3; P < .001; chest, 39.4 [3.1] °C vs 42.9 [4.0] °C; t98 = 4.9; P < .001), and pressure pain detection (mean [SD] NAC, 89.9 [45.6] kPa vs 130.5 [68.9] kPa; t86 = 3.9; P < .001; chest, 128.5 [38.0] kPa vs 175.5 [49.3] kPa; t96 = 4.0; P = .001). ANOVA demonstrated that TNR significantly improved patient-reported nipple sensation (F = 60.5; P < .001), chest light touch (F = 8.1; P = .01) and erogenous sensation (F = 8.3; P = .01). Significantly more patients who underwent TNR than those who did not reported nipple hypersensitivity until 3 months postoperatively (8% vs 4% at 12 months).Conclusion and RelevanceIn this prospective matched cohort study, TNR was associated with improved quantitative and patient-reported sensation. Patients should be counseled about the risk of transient NAC hypersensitivity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
Contact Info
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Product
Resources
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.
