1941
DOI: 10.1017/s0022029900003484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

279. The estimation of lactose in milk

Abstract: THE estimation of lactose in milk by copper reduction methods gives results which are usually somewhat lower than those obtained by the polarimetric method. An adequate explanation of this discrepancy is still lacking. Recent work(i,2,3) has shown that a second sugar, probably glucose, is present in milk, but the proportion is very small and would not account for the differences in the lactose percentages obtained by the two methods. The present paper reports an examination of several of the methods of lactose… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1942
1942
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After being filtered through linen to extract any foreign particles each milk sample was stored at 1° C. for not more than 1 week before analysis. Protein was determined by the macro-Kjeldahl method (N x 6-38), fat by the Gerber method, lactose by McDowell's adaptation (17) of Lane & Eynon's method and dry matter and ash by the methods described by Ling (18).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After being filtered through linen to extract any foreign particles each milk sample was stored at 1° C. for not more than 1 week before analysis. Protein was determined by the macro-Kjeldahl method (N x 6-38), fat by the Gerber method, lactose by McDowell's adaptation (17) of Lane & Eynon's method and dry matter and ash by the methods described by Ling (18).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each cow's samples were bulked separately in two 5-day lots which were termed ' Bulk 1' (the first ten milkings of the measurement period) and 'Bulk 2' (the last ten milkings). The bulked samples from each cow were analysed for the following constituents: butterfat by the Gerber method (British Standards Institution, 1936); total solids by evaporation at 100° C.; solids-not-fat by calculation; lactose by McDowell's (1941) modification of the Lane-Eynon method; total nitrogen by micro-Kjeldahl procedure; non-casein nitrogen by the same method after precipitation of casein by Ling's (1948) modification of Moir's acetic acid and sodium acetate method; casein by calculation. In the autumn periods the Bulk 2 milks of eight of the cows, one from each of the subgroups selected at random, were analysed for non-protein nitrogen; protein was precipitated with 15 % (w/v) trichloroacetic acid and micro-Kjeldahl analysis was carried out on the supernatant fluid.…”
Section: Records and Analytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical analysis. T h e total solids in the milk samples were determined by drying at 100' (Ling, 1948), crude protein by the macro-Kjeldahl method, lactose by McDowell's (1941) adaptation of Lane and Eynon's method, fat by the Gerber method, ash by the method described by Ling (1948), Ca by a modification of the standard oxalate method which prevented co-precipitation of Mg (Holth, 1949), and P by the method of Rickey & Avens (1955).…”
Section: ) E X P E R I M E N T a Lmentioning
confidence: 99%