DDW Highlights 729Eosinophilic esophagitis ! There are still various open questions regarding the natural course and treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis. A large retrospective analysis of 152 patients with eosinophilic esophagitis from a Swiss database investigated the influence of long-term treatment with topical corticosteroids on the natural course of the disease [1]. Clinical activity (defined as the presence of disease-related symptoms), endoscopic activity (whitish exudates, furrows, rings, strictures), biochemical activity (peripheral eosinophilia > 0.3 g/L), histological activity of eosinophilic esophagitis (presence of > 50 eosinophils per high-power field), and the presence of strictures (lumen < 12 mm) were recorded. During a median follow-up of 5 years (interquartile range [IQR] 2 -6 years), 152 patients had a total of 511 visits (mean 3.4 visits). Interestingly, patients showed clinical activity in 83 % of visits and were asymptomatic in 17 % of visits, only. In the multivariate logistic regression model, risk factors for clinical activity were active endoscopic (odds ratio [OR]: 4.01; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 2.15 -7.49), fibrotic (OR 4.37; 95 % CI, 2.42 -7.90), and the presence of histological activity (data not in abstract). Long-term use of topical steroids showed a significant negative association with clinical symptoms (OR 0.25; 95 % CI, 0.11 -0.54). This study demonstrated for the first time that long-term use of topical steroids could prevent symptoms. Unfortunately, the authors did not provide further information on how long treatment should be performed (eg, dose of corticosteroids, intermittent treatment). The fact that clinical activity showed a good correlation with endoscopic and histological activity, as also demonstrated in this series, seems obvious. The same group investigated the risk of stricture development and the duration of untreated eosinophilic esophagitis [2]. A total of 200 patients were retrospectively evaluated for the presence of strictures (defined as difficulty passing a normal diagnostic endoscope) at the first diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis and diagnostic delay of the disease (defined as time from onset of first symptoms to diagnosis). The median diagnostic delay in the study group was 6 years (IQR 2 -12 years). The authors were able to show that strictures developed over time in their patient cohort. When patients' disease duration was 0 to 2 years, the stricture prevalence was only 17.2 %. After 3 to 5 years, it was 30.8 %; 38.9 % after 6 to 8 years, 37.9 % after 9 to 11 years, 41.7 % after 12 to 14 years, 64.3 % after 15 to 17 years, and 66.7 % after 18 to 20 years. In patients with disease duration of longer than 20 years, more than 70 % of patients showed strictures at endoscopy. In the logistic regression analysis, the only risk factor for strictures at index endoscopy was a long duration of untreated disease, defined as a diagnostic delay of more than 7 years (OR 3.24; 95 % CI, 1.75 -5.97). A further large retrospective series from the Universi...