2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2009.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2D building change detection from high resolution satelliteimagery: A two-step hierarchical method based on 3D invariant primitives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The automation of a DB diagnosis conventionally based on photointerpretation has begun more than 15 years ago (Lu et al, 1998). Several methods were proposed with different input data: satellite images (Champion et al, 2010), aerial images (Zhu et al, 2009), aerial lidar (Rutzinger et al, 2010). Other approaches use terrestrial data like panoramical images (Taneja et al, 2013) or terrestrial laser scans (Kang and Lu, 2010).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The automation of a DB diagnosis conventionally based on photointerpretation has begun more than 15 years ago (Lu et al, 1998). Several methods were proposed with different input data: satellite images (Champion et al, 2010), aerial images (Zhu et al, 2009), aerial lidar (Rutzinger et al, 2010). Other approaches use terrestrial data like panoramical images (Taneja et al, 2013) or terrestrial laser scans (Kang and Lu, 2010).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The used DTM has been generated from the correlation DSM using "elastic grid" tools described in (Champion et al, 2010).…”
Section: "La Réunion" Test Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is a way to obtain a mask of alarms but also a confidence score related to the recurrence of alarms and to belief given to the different sources of alarms. Besides, as some existing methods work at building level (such as (Rottensteiner, 2007) or (Champion et al, 2010)), alarms could be associated to a building (new, demolished or modified) and a confidence score computed for each building (using the scheme presented above), making it possible to sort alarms from the most to the least plausible.…”
Section: Merge Alarmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the various recently proposed methods, those based on Markov Random Fields [8,24,1], kernels [2,26] and neural networks [22,23] have gained important attention. Focusing on man-made object change detection [4,20] in urban and peri-urban regions, several approaches have been proposed based on very high resolution optical and radar data [19,23,6,20]. However, these change detection techniques assume and require accurately co-registered data in order to perform pixel-by-pixel or region-by-region multi-temporal data fusion, correlation or any change analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%