2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.11.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2D whole-building hygrothermal simulation analysis based on a PGD reduced order model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For both the finite difference and combined parametric models, the most expensive operation is to reverse the problem matrix. The number of problem degrees of freedom often yields direct information on the computational complexity of the problem and its cost [16]. With the finite difference model, a system of N t time steps and N x nodes needs to be solved.…”
Section: Calculation Cost and Timementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For both the finite difference and combined parametric models, the most expensive operation is to reverse the problem matrix. The number of problem degrees of freedom often yields direct information on the computational complexity of the problem and its cost [16]. With the finite difference model, a system of N t time steps and N x nodes needs to be solved.…”
Section: Calculation Cost and Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the model solution is given as a direct function of x and t coordinates, along with the extraparameter of the problem. Various examples using the PGD parametric model can be found in applications to heat transfer [12][13][14] with an emphasis on building energy simulation [14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, differences are observed depending on whether the model is generated in 2D or 3D. In most of the literature published, energy models are conditioned by room measurements and the complexity of their shape, by the model type (1D, 2D or 3D), as well as by the long computation times due to numerical complexity, command of space, the passing of time and simulation periods [26]. As a result of this, Fuliotto et al [27] proposed a simple computer tool using uncoupling methods to obtain simplified software to assess the operation of these façades using 2D models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This produces a truly 3D indoor distribution of the flow, conditioned by the vertical temperature gradient of the façade as well as by the mechanical ventilation in the room, now executed with greater precision. due to numerical complexity, command of space, the passing of time and simulation periods [26]. As a result of this, Fuliotto et al [27] proposed a simple computer tool using uncoupling methods to obtain simplified software to assess the operation of these façades using 2D models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each zone, the evolutions of the air temperature T a and the humidity ratio w a are given by the equations [3,4,25]:…”
Section: Coupling the Lumped Air Multizone Model With The Transfer Thmentioning
confidence: 99%