1972
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(72)90093-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2H + reactions from 1.96 to 6.20 MeV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15 represents the ratio of theoretical cross sections compared with the data sets to be discussed below. Confidence in this theoretical shape is reinforced by fact that the most recent directly measured [16] and higher energy [40] experimental data sets follow precisely (except for a few data points) this curve. This can hardly be accidental: even though the model, because of limitations on angular momentum, underestimates the high energy absolute cross-sections, the ratio is well reproduced, suggesting that it is indeed independent of the nuclear matrix elements.…”
Section: The Ma Et Al Datamentioning
confidence: 65%
“…15 represents the ratio of theoretical cross sections compared with the data sets to be discussed below. Confidence in this theoretical shape is reinforced by fact that the most recent directly measured [16] and higher energy [40] experimental data sets follow precisely (except for a few data points) this curve. This can hardly be accidental: even though the model, because of limitations on angular momentum, underestimates the high energy absolute cross-sections, the ratio is well reproduced, suggesting that it is indeed independent of the nuclear matrix elements.…”
Section: The Ma Et Al Datamentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Thus to calculate reaction rates accurately, we must include data at energies higher than those of the present work, although data at these energies contribute relatively little to the integral at the relevant temperatures. For this purpose and to make a fair judgment of how the new data compare to the NACRE compilation, we have used the same data at high energies as those used in NACRE compilation, the data of Schulte et al [37]. We have included this data up to E c.m.…”
Section: Results Implications and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…III E. The coefficients are normalized to the P0 coefficients. [37] The statistical uncertainties of Ref. [37] were multiplied by 5 in the figure and the fit.…”
Section: Results Implications and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The astrophysical factor S(E) for the nuclear reaction (1) after the background subtraction (solid black circles), where the effective Gamow peak energy is used as Ec.m.. "Conventional" experiments [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] are included for comparison.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of low-energy nuclear physics is crucial in both astrophysics, playing a key role in the determination of primordial abundances in Big Bang nucleosynthesis (BBN) models, and applied (plasma) physics, as it lies in the energy region of interest for the operation and design of future fusion power plants. Direct and indirect measurements of the cross-sections of these reactions have been performed * lattuadad@lns.infn.it over the years [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], some suggesting that a screening potential due to electrons can lower the Coulomb barrier between the projectile and the target nuclei at very low energies [11,12], resulting in an increase of the cross-section when compared with that of the same interaction with bare nuclei and with the ones occurring in astrophysical plasmas [1,6,13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%