2π spectrometer: A new apparatus for the investigation of ion surface interaction

“…Therefore a significant energy loss is not accumulated only at the immediate vicinity of the surface, as in the case of electronic stopping [18], but in a rather large z interval extending up to 30 a.u. above the surface.The experimental setup has been described in detail elsewhere [19], and only a brief report is given here. Inside a UHV chamber, a pulsed ion or neutral beam interacts at a grazing angle c with a LiF(001) single crystal.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The experimental setup has been described in detail elsewhere [19], and only a brief report is given here. Inside a UHV chamber, a pulsed ion or neutral beam interacts at a grazing angle c with a LiF(001) single crystal.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Subsurface-Channeling-Like Energy Loss Structure of the Skipping Motion on an Ionic Crystal

et al. 2000

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The skipping motion of Ne+ ions in grazing scattering from the LiF(001) surface is studied for velocity below 0.1 a.u. with a time-of-flight technique. It is demonstrated that suppression of electronic excitation and dominance of optical phonon excitation in the projectile stopping results in an odd 1,3,5,... progression of the energy loss peaks, a feature usually ascribed to subsurface channeling. The experimental findings are well reproduced by parameter-free model calculations where thermal vibrations are the dominant cause for the ion trapping and detrapping.

show abstract

“…The main part of the experimental setup [16] is composed of 16 microchannel plate detectors mounted on a hemisphere surrounding the target and placed in a UHV m-metal chamber. The 600 eV proton beam is chopped, reduced to a size of 100 mm, and sent to the LiF(100) target at incidence angles between 0.4 ± and 2.9 ± , thus keeping the normal energy below 3 eV.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Energy Loss of Low Energy Protons on LiF(100): Surface Excitation andH−Mediated Electron Emission

et al. 1999

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Impact of 600 eV protons at grazing incidence on LiF(100) is studied with a new coincidence technique combining energy loss and electron spectroscopy. Correlation between the secondary electrons and the charge state of the scattered projectiles demonstrates the role of the H 2 ions formed on the surface as precursors for electron emission. However, the main channel for energy loss is not associated with electron emission but is interpreted as the population of surface excitons. PACS numbers: 79.20.Rf, 34.50.Dy, 34.70. + e, Since the pioneering work of Souda et al.[1] ten years ago, the study of low-energy ions interacting with large band gap insulators and the subsequent energy loss and electronic emission has attracted much interest [2][3][4][5][6][7]. Compared to metallic surfaces, the large band gap and high binding energies of the valence electrons are expected to induce profound differences from several aspects: (i) The energy loss (through electronic stopping) of ions traveling along the surface should exhibit a threshold behavior with incident energy. (ii) The ion velocity threshold for kinetic electron emission is expected to increase with respect to that of metals. (iii) The resonant electron transfer (from and to the solid) should be strongly reduced. Points (i) and (ii) are simply due to the much larger energy required to excite or ionize valence electrons. The most recent observations by Auth et al. [8] have confirmed point (i) in collisions of protons with LiF but with a threshold behavior appearing only at substantially lower energy than expected [9]. With respect to point (ii), Vana et al. [2] showed that no clear energy threshold can be observed in the secondary electron emission yield during singly charged ions (H 1 , Ar 1 ) collision on LiF, whereas a threshold of 1 keV was measured for the same projectiles on Au. As for charge exchange, the resonant neutralization of singly charged alkali ions and the resonant ionization of alkali atoms is strongly reduced because of the band gap [10]. The suppression of this electron loss channel is also partly responsible for the surprisingly large negative ion fractions, up to 60%-90% [11,12] observed for oxygen or fluorine interacting with alkali halides. The capture process was elucidated only recently as being due to a lowering of the projectile affinity level in the Madelung potential [8,13,14].The presence of a large band gap indeed controls the resonant electron capture and loss but does not seem to play the same decisive role in the energy loss or in the electron emission. This paradox has been studied in detail for the H 1 -LiF system, which may be considered as a reference. The projectile has a well-known electronic structure, and since the LiF band gap extends above the vacuum level, energy loss and electron emission should be intimately related. These studies have called for the existence of an intermediate state able to reduce the effective band gap during the collision process. On one hand, independent measurements of secondary electron yields [...

show abstract

2π spectrometer: A new apparatus for the investigation of ion surface interaction

Cited by 30 publications

References 19 publications

Collisions of ions with insulator surfaces: charging and discharging dynamics

Collisions of ions with insulator surfaces: charging and discharging dynamics

Subsurface-Channeling-Like Energy Loss Structure of the Skipping Motion on an Ionic Crystal

Energy Loss of Low Energy Protons on LiF(100): Surface Excitation andH−Mediated Electron Emission

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About