2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.06.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3.11

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] In the present study, perfusion defect extent and severity assessed by visual analysis by expert observers and quantified using a standard 17-segment model (SSSs, SRSs, and SDSs) were also no different for ''quarter-time'' WBR compared to ''full-time'' OSEM. However, the number of patients with perfusion abnormalities was relatively limited (n = 45); therefore, conclusions regarding characterization of perfusion defects and associated wall motion abnormalities with ''quarter-time'' WBR are somewhat limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] In the present study, perfusion defect extent and severity assessed by visual analysis by expert observers and quantified using a standard 17-segment model (SSSs, SRSs, and SDSs) were also no different for ''quarter-time'' WBR compared to ''full-time'' OSEM. However, the number of patients with perfusion abnormalities was relatively limited (n = 45); therefore, conclusions regarding characterization of perfusion defects and associated wall motion abnormalities with ''quarter-time'' WBR are somewhat limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…We and other investigators have reported that compared to filtered back projection (FBP), WBR, which models noise in the reconstruction process, maintains or even improves myocardial perfusion SPECT quality, even with lower count density ''halftime'' acquisitions. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Because the WBR algorithm has the potential to cope with even lower count density data with higher noise content, we postulated that this new software method could be further modified to provide diagnostic quality gated myocardial perfusion SPECT with even shorter, ''quarter-time'' stress and rest acquisitions. 13,14 Based on phantom studies and pilot patient results, the WBR approach was optimized to address quarter-time statistics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of dynamic-SPECT, a novel technology for high-speed MPI, with standard image acquisition showed increased count sensitivity and resolution with acquisition times of only 2 to 4 min (1). Scan time was also reduced in a WBR study, demonstrating no differences in quantitative indexes of LV function, thickening, and volumes (2), and a phantom study of iterative reconstruction combined with CT-based attenuation correction and scatter correction showed good correlation with 2340Russell et al JACC Vol. 50, No.…”
Section: Original Research: Abstract Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 93%