2012
DOI: 10.4310/hha.2012.v14.n2.a1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3 × 3 lemma for star-exact sequences

Abstract: A regular category is said to be normal when it is pointed and every regular epimorphism in it is a normal epimorphism. Any abelian category is normal, and in a normal category one can define short exact sequences in a similar way as in an abelian category. Then, the corresponding 3 × 3 lemma is equivalent to the so-called subtractivity, which in universal algebra is also known as congruence 0-permutability. In the context of non-pointed regular categories, short exact sequences can be replaced with "exact for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, if all rows and two out of three of the columns including the middle one are exact forks, then the third column is an exact fork as well [3,Theorem 3.1]. However, this only works if the context is sufficiently strong: the article [3] treats the case of a regular Mal'tsev category, but variations on this theme have been considered in more general environments [20,18,13]; in [12], the pointed and unpointed cases are even studied in a single framework.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, if all rows and two out of three of the columns including the middle one are exact forks, then the third column is an exact fork as well [3,Theorem 3.1]. However, this only works if the context is sufficiently strong: the article [3] treats the case of a regular Mal'tsev category, but variations on this theme have been considered in more general environments [20,18,13]; in [12], the pointed and unpointed cases are even studied in a single framework.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that N -trivial objects are closed under strong quotients. One says that a multi-pointed category C has enough trivial objects [8] when N is a closed ideal [14], i.e. any morphism in N factors through an N -trivial object and, moreover, the class of N -trivial objects is closed under subobjects and squares, where the latter property means that, for any Ntrivial object X, the object X 2 = X × X is N -trivial.…”
Section: The Star-cuboid Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This property is referred to as having enough trivial objects in [9] (see also [12], and the references therein, for the related notion of a closed ideal of morphisms). There are several equivalent conditions defining when a category has enough trivial objects (see Proposition 3.5 in [9]). For the purpose of the present article, the following will be the most suitable one:…”
Section: Of Stars and Morphisms The Left-hand Side Diagram Is A Starmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recall also that a finitely complete category is quasi-pointed [3] if it has an initial object 0, a terminal object 1, and the unique arrow 0 → 1 is a monomorphism. As explained in [9] any quasi-pointed category provides an example of proto-pointed context: it suffices to choose for N the class of morphisms that factor through the initial object. Also, in the quasi-pointed context, C clearly has enough trivial objects.…”
Section: Definition 27 ([9]mentioning
confidence: 99%