2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2003.10.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3-(4-Aminobutyn-1-yl)pyridines: binding at α4β2 nicotinic cholinergic receptors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[70] The trend of affinity found in the (6-quinolinyl)butynyl series is different from that reported for their 3-pyridyl analogues: compound 13 a (R 1 = H, R 2 = Me) showed an affinity for rat brain homogenate 4-5 times higher than that of the dimethylamino and trimethylammonium analogues; [71] the agonistic properties of these latter compounds have not been determined.…”
Section: Agonistsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[70] The trend of affinity found in the (6-quinolinyl)butynyl series is different from that reported for their 3-pyridyl analogues: compound 13 a (R 1 = H, R 2 = Me) showed an affinity for rat brain homogenate 4-5 times higher than that of the dimethylamino and trimethylammonium analogues; [71] the agonistic properties of these latter compounds have not been determined.…”
Section: Agonistsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…[60,71,95] The pharmacophoric patterns of nAChR, both from SAR and computational techniques such as DISCO and Catalyst HipHop, were widely used in the conformer selection and in the alignment of the ligands involved in the development of the nicotinic 3D QSAR models, that is, in the construction of mathematical models aimed at uncovering relationships between chemical properties, the 3D molecular features of the compounds, and biological activity of the set of nicotinic ligands. Such models can be regarded as an empirical picture of the biomacromolecular target and their determination has been accomplished by procedures such as CoMFA, CoMSIA, GRID/GOLPE, or related-field approaches.…”
Section: Allosteric Modulatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…59 Both compounds are reported to bind with nanomolar affinity to the receptor. 50,60 So it can be suggested that ligands dock into the active site in a way that allows them to interact with different residues according to their own distance between the pharmacophoric points. In this regard, a recently-published study also predicts different binding modes of nicotinic ligands within the active site of the receptor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…injection, its efficacy being similar to that of 9 a and 9 b. 70 The trend of affinity found in the (6‐quinolinyl)butynyl series is different from that reported for their 3‐pyridyl analogues: compound 13 a (R 1 =H, R 2 =Me) showed an affinity for rat brain homogenate 4–5 times higher than that of the dimethylamino and trimethylammonium analogues;71 the agonistic properties of these latter compounds have not been determined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D QSAR and QSAR studies on nAChR paralleled the efforts in the development of the pharmacophore models,95, 189, 190, 193, 195–198 supporting the rational design and synthesis of novel nicotinic ligands 60. 71, 95 The pharmacophoric patterns of nAChR, both from SAR and computational techniques such as DISCO and Catalyst HipHop, were widely used in the conformer selection and in the alignment of the ligands involved in the development of the nicotinic 3D QSAR models, that is, in the construction of mathematical models aimed at uncovering relationships between chemical properties, the 3D molecular features of the compounds, and biological activity of the set of nicotinic ligands. Such models can be regarded as an empirical picture of the biomacromolecular target and their determination has been accomplished by procedures such as CoMFA, CoMSIA, GRID/GOLPE, or related‐field approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%