2015
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2014.2363365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3-D Integral Formulation Using Facet Elements for Thin Conductive Shells Coupled With an External Circuit

Abstract: A volume integral formulation using facet elements to compute eddy currents in thin conductive shells is presented. The formulation is general and considers the field variation through the depth due to the skin effect. The formulation leads to an equivalent lumped elements circuit that can be coupled with an external circuit. The resolution of the circuit is achieved by the independent loops method. The formulation has been validated because of two numerical examples. Results are compared with an axisymmetric … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These values are close to what we have obtained. In article [33], critical exponents are measured for the nanoparticle ensemble Pr 0.6 Sr 0.4 MnO 3 . Critical exponents values are obtained as follows: β=0.486−0.495, γ= 1.009−1.042.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values are close to what we have obtained. In article [33], critical exponents are measured for the nanoparticle ensemble Pr 0.6 Sr 0.4 MnO 3 . Critical exponents values are obtained as follows: β=0.486−0.495, γ= 1.009−1.042.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eddy current loss problem is commonly formulated numerically and adopted for use with boundary and finite element methods [7,8]. On the contrary, in some cases a volume integral formulation using facet elements is translated into an equivalent lumped element network as demonstrated in [9]. Analytical models are typically fast to evaluate, but often lack accuracy due to some geometrical assumptions and a limited number of spatial harmonics of the magnetic flux density considered in the calculation of the eddy current loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%