“…For example, the modeling of cusp soft electron precipitation in a coupled global geospace simulation requires a self‐consistent, dynamic, and accurate specification of the cusp area [e.g., Zhang et al , ]. In global MHD simulations, the area of the polar cusp can be defined by either the spatial extent of the diamagnetic depression [e.g., Niehof et al , ; Adamson et al , ; Walsh et al , ] or the simulated cusp plasma property, viz, relative density enhancement or parallel ion flux at high altitude. The three diagnostic methods give approximately the same area of the polar cusp, and only the results from the diamagnetic depression method are shown in the following section.…”