2021
DOI: 10.1002/cctc.202100276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3‐D X‐ray Nanotomography Reveals Different Carbon Deposition Mechanisms in a Single Catalyst Particle

Abstract: Catalyst deactivation involves a complex interplay of processes taking place at different length and time scales. Understanding this phenomenon is one of the grand challenges in solid catalyst characterization. A process contributing to deactivation is carbon deposition (i. e., coking), which reduces catalyst activity by limiting diffusion and blocking active sites. However, characterizing coke formation and its effects remains challenging as it involves both the organic and inorganic phase of the catalytic pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

5
35
0
6

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
5
35
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that this comparison is of qualitative nature based on the N e and the resolution is not high enough to clearly identify single voxels of coking. A similar gradient of the N e during coke formation was also found in FCC catalysts particles studied with X‐ray holotomography [26] . However, further detailed experiments at different coking stages are required to validate this conclusion.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It should be noted that this comparison is of qualitative nature based on the N e and the resolution is not high enough to clearly identify single voxels of coking. A similar gradient of the N e during coke formation was also found in FCC catalysts particles studied with X‐ray holotomography [26] . However, further detailed experiments at different coking stages are required to validate this conclusion.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…However, the differential contrast approach shown was sensitive to relative changes in N e in an arbitrary unit scale, without providing a physical unit for N e . Furthermore, PXCT greatly exceeds the maximum resolution so far shown with holotomography [26] …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…vorgeschlagen möglich, da z. B. graphitischer Koks oder Aktivkohle verschiedene N e aufweisen [26] . Für solch genaue Unterscheidung ist eine höhere räumliche Auflösung jedoch unerlässlich, um die N e innerhalb der 3D‐Probenstruktur genau zuzuordnen.…”
Section: Methodsunclassified
“…Jedoch war dieser andere Kontrastansatz nur sensitiv bezüglich relativer Änderungen der N e in einer Skala beliebiger Einheit ohne echte physikalische Einheit. Außerdem übersteigt die bisher gezeigte mögliche maximale Auflösung von PXCT die der Holotomographie [26] …”
Section: Methodsunclassified