SAE Technical Paper Series 1998
DOI: 10.4271/980221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3-Dimensional Simulation of Vehicle Response to Tire Blow-outs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 1(a), the flat tire is locked after braking, although the level of braking is not high. The tire characteristic changes and transient nature are coincident with the experimental data in the literature, 2–4 implying that the simulation is believable. Moreover, as shown in Figure 2, the flat tire results in a yaw moment on the vehicle, and both yaw angle and lateral distance keep increasing after the tire blow-out.…”
Section: Vehicle Dynamics Analysis and Modelingsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In Figure 1(a), the flat tire is locked after braking, although the level of braking is not high. The tire characteristic changes and transient nature are coincident with the experimental data in the literature, 2–4 implying that the simulation is believable. Moreover, as shown in Figure 2, the flat tire results in a yaw moment on the vehicle, and both yaw angle and lateral distance keep increasing after the tire blow-out.…”
Section: Vehicle Dynamics Analysis and Modelingsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Many have studied and modelled the motion of cars and trucks at tyre blow-out, e.g. [4] and [5]. Few have studied the variety in behaviour among different drivers at tyre blowout.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hankey claimed that the steering response was 0.3 s faster than the braking response as cited in [30]. Another study with a tyre blow-out test resulted in a steering reaction time of only 0.5 s. [37] This low value might have been caused by the sound of the tyre explosion kit that was used, the full alertness of the test person and the fact that humans react faster to audible signals. Secondly, the test was not statistically sound.…”
Section: Reaction Timementioning
confidence: 96%