2019
DOI: 10.4230/lipics.socg.2019.44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3-Manifold Triangulations with Small Treewidth

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The theoretical efficiency of the aforementioned FPT algorithms crucially depends on the assumption that the dual graph of the input triangulation has small treewidth. To understand their scope, it is thus instructive to consider the treewidth tw(M) of a compact 3-manifold M, defined as the smallest treewidth of the dual graph of any triangulation of M. Indeed, the relation between the treewidth and other quantities associated with 3-manifolds has recently been investigated in various contexts [25,26,27,28,41]. For instance, in [28] together with Wagner we have shown that the treewidth of a non-Haken 3-manifold is always bounded below in terms of its Heegaard genus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The theoretical efficiency of the aforementioned FPT algorithms crucially depends on the assumption that the dual graph of the input triangulation has small treewidth. To understand their scope, it is thus instructive to consider the treewidth tw(M) of a compact 3-manifold M, defined as the smallest treewidth of the dual graph of any triangulation of M. Indeed, the relation between the treewidth and other quantities associated with 3-manifolds has recently been investigated in various contexts [25,26,27,28,41]. For instance, in [28] together with Wagner we have shown that the treewidth of a non-Haken 3-manifold is always bounded below in terms of its Heegaard genus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assume that we glue the manifolds M v along the arcs of G to obtain a closed 3-manifold M. Without restrictions on how these pieces are glued together, this cannot result in a lower bound tw(M) in terms of tw(G): we can construct Seifert fibered spaces M in this way, even if G = (V, E) is the complete graph with |V | arbitrarily large. At the same time, Seifert fibered spaces have constant treewidth, see [27].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%