Geschlecht Als Widersprüchliche Institution 2018
DOI: 10.5771/9783845278520-87
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3 Soziale Agency: Arbeit an der (De-)Institutionalisierung von Geschlecht

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our interest in the concept of the logic of appropriateness lies in its focus on normativity and its capacity to address the maintenance of power relations in gender equality discourses. By contrast, the idea of taken-for-granted routines (Scott, 1995(Scott, , 2014 largely omits this aspect since it assumes that normativity remains unquestioned and that organizational actors are mainly unaware of power relations (see also Amstutz, Nussbaumer, & Brand, 2018;Powell et al, 2018;Styhre, 2014). We therefore see a critical potential in reconsidering the decisive role of the logic of appropriateness in organizational gender analysis.…”
Section: The Logic Of Appropriateness: Heteronormativity As Consolimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our interest in the concept of the logic of appropriateness lies in its focus on normativity and its capacity to address the maintenance of power relations in gender equality discourses. By contrast, the idea of taken-for-granted routines (Scott, 1995(Scott, , 2014 largely omits this aspect since it assumes that normativity remains unquestioned and that organizational actors are mainly unaware of power relations (see also Amstutz, Nussbaumer, & Brand, 2018;Powell et al, 2018;Styhre, 2014). We therefore see a critical potential in reconsidering the decisive role of the logic of appropriateness in organizational gender analysis.…”
Section: The Logic Of Appropriateness: Heteronormativity As Consolimentioning
confidence: 99%