2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.02.862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3092

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CO 2 or H 2 O might screen the catalyst at lower temperatures from the adsorption of CO and O 2 , which lead to the decrease of CO conversion at temperatures lower than 180 C [22]. However, CO 2 and H 2 O could only bring a temporary poisoning effect on the catalyst, for the adsorbed CO 2 or H 2 O had much weaker interaction with the catalyst than that of CO [8].…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CO 2 or H 2 O might screen the catalyst at lower temperatures from the adsorption of CO and O 2 , which lead to the decrease of CO conversion at temperatures lower than 180 C [22]. However, CO 2 and H 2 O could only bring a temporary poisoning effect on the catalyst, for the adsorbed CO 2 or H 2 O had much weaker interaction with the catalyst than that of CO [8].…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PROX may be the most suitable method to reduce the amount of carbon monoxide to a level for use in electrochemical fuel cells [5]. The catalysts employed in the PROX include noble and nonnoble metal catalysts, while CuO2CeO 2 catalysts show a catalytic performance as well as, if not better than, noble metal catalysts [6][7][8][9]. Generally, preparation methods have a strong influence on the catalytic performance of CuO2CeO 2 catalysts [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%