2011
DOI: 10.1889/1.3621337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

31.1: Invited Paper: The Impact of Self‐luminous Electronic Devices on Melatonin Suppression

Abstract: Self-luminous electronic devices emit optical radiation at short wavelengths, close to the peak sensitivity of melatonin suppression. The present paper uses the mathematical model to estimate acute melatonin suppression by electronic devices and computer screens. Results of a study testing these predictions are also presented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, if participants were using a cell phone close to the eye, the pendant device will likely not capture that light exposure; therefore, the actual light exposures during the experiment may have been higher than those recorded by the pendant Daysimeter. Measurements of various types and models of self-luminous devices performed at our laboratory 23 revealed that certain desktop computer screens deliver a CS value of as much as 0.27 (equivalent to 27% suppression). Since in the present study, suppression after 1 hour was about 23%, it is possible that CS values from the self-luminous devices used by participants during the study were higher than those recorded by the pendant Daysimeter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, if participants were using a cell phone close to the eye, the pendant device will likely not capture that light exposure; therefore, the actual light exposures during the experiment may have been higher than those recorded by the pendant Daysimeter. Measurements of various types and models of self-luminous devices performed at our laboratory 23 revealed that certain desktop computer screens deliver a CS value of as much as 0.27 (equivalent to 27% suppression). Since in the present study, suppression after 1 hour was about 23%, it is possible that CS values from the self-luminous devices used by participants during the study were higher than those recorded by the pendant Daysimeter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate the simplified function, it was possible to compare the predicted CS t values with nocturnal melatonin suppression data from 11 published studies [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] (Supplementary Tables S2 and S3). Figure 7 shows the calculated melatonin suppression data from the selected studies along with a priori predictions from the simplified function (Eq.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%