2007
DOI: 10.1299/jsmedsd.2007.17.302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3205 A proposal of new idea generation methods based on classification of idea generation methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the most prominent are: Synectics, TIRZ methodology, Mindmapping, Lateral thinking, Six thinking hats, Brainwriting, Systematic Inventive Thinking, SCAMPER, etc. Asanuma et al (2011) identified 36 idea generation methods suitable for practical design. Burns in his book "New Venture Creation: A Framework for Entrepreneurial Start-Ups" (2017) groups dozens of methods for generating business ideas in 6 areas: creating opportunity, spotting an opportunity, nurturing creativity and innovation, active discovery, exploring change, and exploring product inadequacies.…”
Section: Traditional Methods For Generating Business Ideasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the most prominent are: Synectics, TIRZ methodology, Mindmapping, Lateral thinking, Six thinking hats, Brainwriting, Systematic Inventive Thinking, SCAMPER, etc. Asanuma et al (2011) identified 36 idea generation methods suitable for practical design. Burns in his book "New Venture Creation: A Framework for Entrepreneurial Start-Ups" (2017) groups dozens of methods for generating business ideas in 6 areas: creating opportunity, spotting an opportunity, nurturing creativity and innovation, active discovery, exploring change, and exploring product inadequacies.…”
Section: Traditional Methods For Generating Business Ideasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several works elaborate numerous methods (in a bundle) and try to classify them according to chosen criteria (Asanuma et al, 2011;Burns, 2017;Creative Education Foundation, 2015;Hanington & Martin, 2019). Since these listings and classification didn't fit our research needs, we have proposed classifications based on some important features of the numerous idea-generating methods (Figure 2).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%