2016
DOI: 10.2527/msasas2016-333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

333 Influence of vaccination with an inactivated or modified live viral reproductive vaccine on reproductive parameters in beef cows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in a production setting, increased demands are placed on later calving cows to have a shorter period for uterine involution prior to the breeding season in order to maintain productivity by raising one calf every year ( Short et al, 1990 ; Caton and Hess, 2010 ). Thus, greater mineral nutritional status of early calving dams at pasture turnout and pre-breeding may be partially responsible for the enhanced pregnancy rates observed as cows progress postpartum ( Randel, 1990 ; Short et al, 1990 ; Stevenson et al, 2003 ; Hess et al, 2005 ; Perry et al, 2016 ). In addition, these data may be used to make the case for providing high quality mineral supplementation before breeding to facilitate re-alimentation of tissue stores of mineral, especially in cows that calved late.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in a production setting, increased demands are placed on later calving cows to have a shorter period for uterine involution prior to the breeding season in order to maintain productivity by raising one calf every year ( Short et al, 1990 ; Caton and Hess, 2010 ). Thus, greater mineral nutritional status of early calving dams at pasture turnout and pre-breeding may be partially responsible for the enhanced pregnancy rates observed as cows progress postpartum ( Randel, 1990 ; Short et al, 1990 ; Stevenson et al, 2003 ; Hess et al, 2005 ; Perry et al, 2016 ). In addition, these data may be used to make the case for providing high quality mineral supplementation before breeding to facilitate re-alimentation of tissue stores of mineral, especially in cows that calved late.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vaccination of BVDV and BHV‐1 naïve heifers 8 days before breeding was detrimental for pregnancy rates in 1 study 218 . Another study reported a 3.6% reduction in pregnancy rates at day 56 after artificial insemination (AI) but not in subsequent days in cows vaccinated 30 days before AI with a MLV vaccine versus nonvaccinated cows 221 . Based upon this data, the timing of vaccination is important, and the closer time proximity to vaccination with developing and midluteal phases of the estrous cycle, the greater is the negative effect on pregnancy rate 218‐220 .…”
Section: Vaccination Against Bvdv: What Factors Impact Vaccine Efficamentioning
confidence: 99%