2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

356: Maternal care matters: An analysis of hospital Cesarean delivery rates in Michigan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…39 The lowest rates (27%-29%) were in four hospitals, all of which fell in the mid-range of total births and none of which consistently billed TOLAC births. Our descriptive study could not provide a reason for this finding, but future studies might explore possible nonclinical influences on rural cesarean births, including differing practitioner attitudes, 40 hospital culture, 39,41,42 use of birth professionals such as doulas, 43 or the impact of using delivery practitioners associated with lower cesarean rates such as midwives or family physicians. [44][45][46] This study has several limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…39 The lowest rates (27%-29%) were in four hospitals, all of which fell in the mid-range of total births and none of which consistently billed TOLAC births. Our descriptive study could not provide a reason for this finding, but future studies might explore possible nonclinical influences on rural cesarean births, including differing practitioner attitudes, 40 hospital culture, 39,41,42 use of birth professionals such as doulas, 43 or the impact of using delivery practitioners associated with lower cesarean rates such as midwives or family physicians. [44][45][46] This study has several limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%