2009
DOI: 10.1002/pfi.20069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

360-degree feedback: Going around in circles?

Abstract: ConfoundingThere's an old coaching rule that says the best feedback comes from people who see you in the game, but they should all be watching the same game.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, discrepancies between self-ratings and others' ratings motivate them to make behavioural adjustments for self-development provided they have a self-efficacy for development and this in turn may lead to improved performance (Brutus, Fleenor, and London 1998). Moreover, managers can use this information from others' ratings for goal-setting, and performance is likely to improve with systematic planning and organizational support (London and Smither 1995), though one must design and implement it carefully (Atwater, Brett, and Charles 2007;Tosti and Addison 2009), and also look at it from a gender perspective (Ely, Ibarra, and Kolb 2011). Recent literature (e.g.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, discrepancies between self-ratings and others' ratings motivate them to make behavioural adjustments for self-development provided they have a self-efficacy for development and this in turn may lead to improved performance (Brutus, Fleenor, and London 1998). Moreover, managers can use this information from others' ratings for goal-setting, and performance is likely to improve with systematic planning and organizational support (London and Smither 1995), though one must design and implement it carefully (Atwater, Brett, and Charles 2007;Tosti and Addison 2009), and also look at it from a gender perspective (Ely, Ibarra, and Kolb 2011). Recent literature (e.g.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Sysinger & Crispo ). The employee also completes a self‐assessment that enables them to reflect on their practice (Tosti & Addison ). This collaborative approach is designed to ensure an accurate account of performance is obtained (Dupee et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). While some researchers conclude that the concept of MSF is excellent (Tosti & Addison ), Wood et al . () recommend that feedback must be delivered in the appropriate way to facilitate a change in performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, experts warn that many well intentioned multisource feedback programs are often implemented in a manner that can do more damage than benefit to the organization and their employees. 8 So, while the U.S. Army has been utilizing a form of multisource feedback for well over two decades, in fact it could be considered a pioneer in this regard, it can certainly leverage best business practices to ensure the success and sustainability of its programs.…”
Section: Degree Feedback Best Practices and The Us Army's Msaf Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is enormous potential benefit in leaders knowing how they are perceived by people who have different working relationships with them. 6 Research indicates that effective development of leadership skills can be significantly enhanced by the utilization of quality performance feedback from one's subordinates, peers, and superiors. -However, without a formal and effective multisource feedback system, such feedback is not available to leaders for a variety of reasons, including fear of repercussion, time constraints, and inability to effectively define and communicate appropriate feedback messages.‖ 7 Consequently, this has resulted in the popular growth of formally administered multisource feedback systems in both the civilian and military sector.…”
Section: Degree Feedback Best Practices and The Us Army's Msaf Programmentioning
confidence: 99%