2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.07.872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

39.3 Mental Health Service Use and Clinical Outcomes Among Children Served in 2 Co-Located Pediatric Care Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some challenges of this model 122 include the limited number of MH clinicians interested and trained in working in the primary care setting; high demand resulting in rapid filling of patient caseloads and subsequent inability to accept new patients; use of "warm handoffs" and other strategies to increase referral completion that may be non-reimbursable and may interfere with MH specialist historic workways (uninterrupted lengthy visits); limited opportunities for true teambased care, thereby perpetuating interprofessional "silos"; limited ability to provide non-reimbursable care coordination and preventive services; and uneven insurance coverage and, to some degree, the same patient/family cost, inconvenience, and stigma as experienced in the external referral model. Moreover, the benefits of co-located models appear to be modest in both adult 103,123 and pediatric [104][105][106]124 populations.…”
Section: Coordinated Clinical Service Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some challenges of this model 122 include the limited number of MH clinicians interested and trained in working in the primary care setting; high demand resulting in rapid filling of patient caseloads and subsequent inability to accept new patients; use of "warm handoffs" and other strategies to increase referral completion that may be non-reimbursable and may interfere with MH specialist historic workways (uninterrupted lengthy visits); limited opportunities for true teambased care, thereby perpetuating interprofessional "silos"; limited ability to provide non-reimbursable care coordination and preventive services; and uneven insurance coverage and, to some degree, the same patient/family cost, inconvenience, and stigma as experienced in the external referral model. Moreover, the benefits of co-located models appear to be modest in both adult 103,123 and pediatric [104][105][106]124 populations.…”
Section: Coordinated Clinical Service Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%