2001
DOI: 10.1038/88327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: The relationship between the neurosensory photoreceptors and the adjacent retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) controls not only normal retinal function, but also the pathogenesis of hereditary retinal degenerations. The molecular bases for both primary photoreceptor and RPE diseases that cause blindness have been identified. Gene therapy has been used successfully to slow degeneration in rodent models of primary photoreceptor diseases, but efficacy of gene therapy directed at photoreceptors and RPE in a large-ani… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
211
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 250 publications
(214 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
211
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study complements the recent remarkable demonstration of restoration of vision in a canine model of an RPE-based disorder by adeno-associated virus mediated transfer of RPE65 (22), as well as an earlier study of mucopolysaccharidosis VII in mice by using an adenovirus vector (21). In these previous studies, the issue of neuronal degeneration could not be addressed because photoreceptor death did not occur during the experimental period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study complements the recent remarkable demonstration of restoration of vision in a canine model of an RPE-based disorder by adeno-associated virus mediated transfer of RPE65 (22), as well as an earlier study of mucopolysaccharidosis VII in mice by using an adenovirus vector (21). In these previous studies, the issue of neuronal degeneration could not be addressed because photoreceptor death did not occur during the experimental period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…We therefore chose to address the problem by somatic gene transfer with a viral vector. Viral gene replacement therapy has been used in a number of animal models of retinal degeneration caused by PR (17)(18)(19)(20) or RPE (21,22) defects. Successful complementation of the rdy phenotype would also serve as a model for treatment of individuals with retinitis pigmentosa who harbor MERTK mutations (23) and, more generally, other diseases in which the RPE is dysfunctional, such as age-related macular degeneration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that older animals (Ͼ10 months) begin to exhibit severe retinal degeneration, initially in distinct topographic regions that later become more generalized (22). Fundus photomontages of the left eye of a 6.5-month-old RHO T4R/ϩ RPE65 Ϫ/Ϫ dog, which could not produce the chromophore because of mutation in the RPE65 gene (24,25,44), displayed hyperreflectivity of the tapetal fundus (Fig. 2B1), moderate vascular attenuation, and changes characteristic of outer retinal thinning and mid-stage disease.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RHO T4R/ϩ and RHO T4R/T4R dogs derive their mutant RHO allele from English mastiff dogs affected with autosomal dominant progressive retinal atrophy as described previously (22,23). RPE65 Ϫ/Ϫ and RPE65 ϩ/Ϫ dogs derive their mutant allele, a 4-bp deletion in the canine RPE65 (retinal pigment epithelium protein of 65 kDa) gene, from a briard dog affected with the canine homolog of Leber's congenital amaurosis (24,25). All dogs used in this study were tested to determine their genotype at either or both the RHO (22,23) and RPE65 (25) loci as described previously.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47 and 56) can now be extended to a large animal. The temporal, functional, and structural progression of disease in the canine model offers an ideal time window of opportunity for gene therapy (16,57). Affected dogs are clinically normal for at least several months before retinal degeneration develops, but at this stage retinal dysfunction can be clearly monitored by dark adaptometry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%