2024
DOI: 10.18063/ijb.2016.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D bioprinting for tissue engineering: Stem cells in hydrogels

Abstract: Surgical limitations require alternative methods of repairing and replacing diseased and damaged tissue. Regenerative medicine is a growing area of research with engineered tissues already being used successfully in patients. However, the demand for such tissues greatly outweighs the supply and a fast and accurate method of production is still required. 3D bioprinting offers precision control as well as the ability to incorporate biological cues and cells directly into the material as it is being fabricated. H… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
(122 reference statements)
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 The properties of the scaffold depend mainly on the fabrication methods and the nature of the biomaterial .6 Twodimensional (2 D) patterns of biochemical and mechanical cues have been generated through the development of numerous intricate methods, but for many cell types, the 2D culture condition may not be appropriate for propagating tissue regeneration. 11 The advantages of 3D printed scaffolds for bone tissue engineering include the fabrication of a well-defined architecture with patient-specific geometries as well as enabling the necessary spatial organization (e.g., of bioactives or cells) within the scaffold for enhancing biological functionality. 7 Scaffolds with controlled surface chemistry, pore size distribution, pore volume, pore interconnectivity, and architecture cannot be fabricated with traditional processing techniques 9,10 such as solvent casting or particle leaching, freeze-drying, and gas foaming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 The properties of the scaffold depend mainly on the fabrication methods and the nature of the biomaterial .6 Twodimensional (2 D) patterns of biochemical and mechanical cues have been generated through the development of numerous intricate methods, but for many cell types, the 2D culture condition may not be appropriate for propagating tissue regeneration. 11 The advantages of 3D printed scaffolds for bone tissue engineering include the fabrication of a well-defined architecture with patient-specific geometries as well as enabling the necessary spatial organization (e.g., of bioactives or cells) within the scaffold for enhancing biological functionality. 7 Scaffolds with controlled surface chemistry, pore size distribution, pore volume, pore interconnectivity, and architecture cannot be fabricated with traditional processing techniques 9,10 such as solvent casting or particle leaching, freeze-drying, and gas foaming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Separate printing can also be used for producing a reinforcement structure from one outlet and a cell‐laden hydrogel from a second outlet . Recently, stereolithography (SLA) was used to incorporate cells into printed structures . SLA involves the use of a focused ultraviolet (UV) light beam on a liquid photopolymer, leading to polymer crosslinking and layer‐by‐layer printing .…”
Section: Bioprintingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D bioprinting has a capability to fabricate complicated structures in high accuracy and reproducibility in the aspect of the shape, size, internal porosity, and interconnectivity [8][9][10] . One of the essential components of 3D bioprinting is the use of bioink which consists of multiple types of cells and various biomaterials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%