2021
DOI: 10.3791/62691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D Bioprinting of Murine Cortical Astrocytes for Engineering Neural-Like Tissue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite concerns surrounding reductions in cell viability due to shear stressors during bioprinting (Shi et al, 2018), we were able to successfully bioprint iPSC-derived astrocytes, NPCs and iBMECs within our lead matrix with a good level of viability similar to what we found using manual gelation. Recent work using extrusion-based bioprinting of rodent astrocytes within composite gelatin-methacryloyl matrices and NPCs within collagen-based matrices have reported viability ranging from 75 - 90 %, similar to our results (de Melo, Cruz, Ribeiro, Mundim, & Porcionatto, 2021; Ouyang et al, 2020; Salaris et al, 2019; Sharma, Smits, De La Vega, Lee, & Willerth, 2020). Furthermore, we show that iBMECs bioprinted in our lead matrix, cultured in AM with tapered ROCK inhibition, remain viable up to 4 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Despite concerns surrounding reductions in cell viability due to shear stressors during bioprinting (Shi et al, 2018), we were able to successfully bioprint iPSC-derived astrocytes, NPCs and iBMECs within our lead matrix with a good level of viability similar to what we found using manual gelation. Recent work using extrusion-based bioprinting of rodent astrocytes within composite gelatin-methacryloyl matrices and NPCs within collagen-based matrices have reported viability ranging from 75 - 90 %, similar to our results (de Melo, Cruz, Ribeiro, Mundim, & Porcionatto, 2021; Ouyang et al, 2020; Salaris et al, 2019; Sharma, Smits, De La Vega, Lee, & Willerth, 2020). Furthermore, we show that iBMECs bioprinted in our lead matrix, cultured in AM with tapered ROCK inhibition, remain viable up to 4 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Despite concerns surrounding reductions in cell viability due to shear stressors during bioprinting (Shi et al, 2018), we were able to successfully bioprint iPSC-derived astrocytes, NPCs and iBMECs within our lead matrix with a good level of viability similar to what we found using manual gelation. Recent work using extrusion-based bioprinting of rodent astrocytes within composite gelatin-methacryloyl matrices and NPCs within collagenbased matrices have reported viability ranging from 75 -90 %, similar to our results (de Melo, Cruz, Ribeiro, Mundim, & Porcionatto, 2021;Ouyang et al, 2020;Salaris et al, 2019;Sharma, Smits, De La Vega, Lee, & Willerth, 2020). Furthermore, we show that iBMECs bioprinted in our lead matrix, cultured in AM with tapered ROCK inhibition, remain viable up to 4 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Primary culture of astrocytes derived from C57Bl/6 mice is well established in the literature and has been a target cell type in regenerative neurobiology studies, including the biofabrication of 3D in vitro neural models. [ 45 , 46 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bioinks Preparation and Crosslinking: GelMA was synthesized according to the recently published protocol. [45] Two bioinks were prepared: GGFL, composed of gelatin (Sigma-Aldrich) 4% (m/v), GelMA 2% (m/v), fibrinogen (Sigma-Aldrich) 3 mg mL -1 , and laminin 2 µg mL -1 , and GGF, composed of gelatin 5% (m/v), GelMA 5% (m/v), and fibrinogen 1.5 mg mL -1 . Briefly, gelatin and GelMA were diluted in PBS 1×, and fibrinogen previously prepared in saline solution was mixed to the gelatin-GelMA emulsion until the established concentrations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation