2018
DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201701026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D Bioprinting of Self‐Standing Silk‐Based Bioink

Abstract: Silk/polyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrogels are studied as self‐standing bioinks for 3D printing for tissue engineering. The two components of the bioink, silk fibroin protein (silk) and PEG, are both Food and Drug Administration approved materials in drug and medical device products. Mixing PEG with silk induces silk β‐sheet structure formation and thus gelation and water insolubility due to physical crosslinking. A variety of constructs with high resolution, high shape fidelity, and homogeneous gel matrices are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
127
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
127
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One key example demonstrated in this current study is the rapid stabilization of the silk bioink mediated by visible light exposure, permitting the creation of complex porous architectures via extrusion printing within a sacrificial template. It is to be highlighted that the silk bioink in this study has not undergone any lengthy modification process to graft photolabile groups onto the protein, nor require addition of rheological modifiers as per the literature . By tuning the resolution and design of the sacrificial Pluronic F‐127 sacrificial template, silk fibroin filaments of high resolution (40 µm) were printed, superior to previously reported studies using this sacrificial approach and gelatin‐based inks .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One key example demonstrated in this current study is the rapid stabilization of the silk bioink mediated by visible light exposure, permitting the creation of complex porous architectures via extrusion printing within a sacrificial template. It is to be highlighted that the silk bioink in this study has not undergone any lengthy modification process to graft photolabile groups onto the protein, nor require addition of rheological modifiers as per the literature . By tuning the resolution and design of the sacrificial Pluronic F‐127 sacrificial template, silk fibroin filaments of high resolution (40 µm) were printed, superior to previously reported studies using this sacrificial approach and gelatin‐based inks .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…3D extrusion printing of silk fibroin has to date required addition of other compounds at high concentrations, including, e.g., gelatin (10–15 wt%), glycerol (25 wt%), or poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG, 40 wt%), to achieve the necessary rheological properties for fiber extrusion. The crosslinking mechanisms utilized in these methods are not compatible with cell encapsulation at high densities required for most regenerative medicine applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study opens intriguing areas for future work. Silk has also recently been evaluated as a potential bioink [103], making the 3D printing stem cell-derived tissues possible.…”
Section: Silkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the inherent virtues of silk fibroin, such as biocompatibility, a green formation process, and tunable biodegradability, another feature is its diversity of conformations, hierarchical microstructures and various material states, endowing the possibility of designing biomaterials with selective and useful performance (Gorenkova et al, ; Hu et al, ; Kumar, Nandi, Kaplan, & Mandal, ; Qi et al, ; Rockwood et al, ). However, it is difficult to fabricate soft, insoluble RSF scaffolds in the absence of chemical crosslink reagent such as glutaraldehyde or horseradish peroxide, since enough beta‐sheet structure is considered a prerequisite for water‐insolubility, but in turn results in a higher stiffness for the material (Cao et al, ; Kim, Park, Kim, Wada, & Kaplan, ; Zheng et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%