“…[2a-d,f-h,j,k,m,o] This is in part because of the low number of 3D organic monomers available, their limited geometries (imposed by the sp, sp 2 and sp 3 hybridization of carbon), and reduced points of extension. For instance, most of the reported 3D COFs have been obtained from tetrahedral (T d ) [4,5] monomers and only a few exceptions of 3D COFs have been obtained from triangular (D 3 ), [6] square (D 4 ), [6] triangular prismatic (D 3h ) [7] and cubic (O h ) [8] monomers. This is illustrated by the small number of topologies reported for 3D COFs (acs, [7b] bcu, [8] bor, [5e] ctn, [5e] dia, [5a-d] ffc, [9] fjh, [6c] lon, [5a] pts, [4, 5f-i] rra, [5j] srs, [6a] stp, [7a] tbo [6b] ), compared to the large number of topologies reported for metal-organic frameworks (> 60).…”