3D CRANI, a novel MR neurography sequence, can reliable visualise the extraforaminal cranial and occipital nerves

Abstract

Objectives We aim to validate 3D CRANI, a novel high-field STIR TSE, MR neurography sequence in the visualisation of the extraforaminal cranial and occipital nerve branches on a 3-T system. Furthermore, we wish to evaluate the role of gadolinium administration and calculate nerve benchmark values for future reference. Methods Eleven consecutive patients underwent MR imaging including the 3D CRANI sequence before and immediately after intravenous gadolinium administration. Two observers rated suppression quality and nerve visualisation using Likert scales before and after contrast administration. Extraforaminal cranial and occipital nerves were assessed. Nerve calibers and signal intensities were measured at predefined anatomical landmarks, and apparent signal intensity ratios were calculated. Results The assessed segments of the cranial and occipital nerves could be identified in most cases. The overall intrarater agreement was 79.2% and interrater agreement was 82.7% (intrarater κ = .561, p < .0001; interrater κ = .642, p < .0001). After contrast administration, this significantly improved to an intrarater agreement of 92.7% and interrater agreement of 93.6% (intrarater κ = .688, p < .0001; interrater κ = .727, p < .0001). Contrast administration improved suppression quality and significant changes in nerve caliber and signal intensity measurements. Nerve diameter and signal intensity benchmarking values were obtained. Conclusion 3D CRANI is reliable for the visualization of the extraforaminal cranial and occipital nerves. Intravenous gadolinium significantly improves MR neurography when applying this sequence. Benchmarking data are published to allow future assessment of the 3D CRANI sequence in patients with pathology of the extraforaminal cranial and occipital nerves. Key Points • MR neurography using the 3D CRANI sequence is a reliable method to evaluate the extraforaminal cranial and occipital nerves. • Gadolinium contrast administration significantly improves suppression quality and nerve visualisation. • Benchmarking values including apparent signal intensity ratios and nerve calibers depend on contrast administration and might play an important role in future studies evaluating extraforaminal cranial and occipital neuropathies.

MR-orthopantomography in operative dentistry and oral and maxillofacial surgery: a proof of concept study

“…Therefore, recent research suggests the suppression of vascular signals by adding a motion-sensitizing T2 preparation prepulse, resulting in a higher contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) without significantly decreasing SNR in anatomical regions with a close proximity of nerves to vascular structures 32 . On the other hand, Casselman et al showed that cranial nerve imaging (3D CRANI), a novel high-field STIR TSE sequence, with gadolinium www.nature.com/scientificreports/ contrast administration significantly improved suppression quality and nerve visualization in the assessment of extraforaminal cranial nerves 33 . Thus, robust blood vessel suppression, better image quality and fewer artifacts could be achieved for magnetic resonance neurography in various anatomical regions.…”

Visualization of clinically silent, odontogenic maxillary sinus mucositis originating from periapical inflammation using MRI: a feasibility study

“…This is the reason why MRI is able to depict soft tissues with a much higher contrast than conventional cross-sectional imaging modalities. Recently, Van der Cruyssen et al and Juerchott et al have shown that by optimizing sequence protocols, direct visualization of small trigeminal branches and even complex structures like the dental pulp is possible, which improves our understanding of nerve physiology in vivo [36][37][38][39]. Furthermore, using T1-based imaging or ultrashort or zero echo time sequences, even the visualization of hard tissues like the mandibular bone and pathological alterations in the course of periodontitis or osteonecrosis has been feasible [9,27,40,41].…”

Visualization of the Facial Nerve with Ultra-high–Frequency Ultrasound

“…Furthermore, computed tomography can only infer pathology of the facial nerve by visualization of erosion or destruction of the adjacent bony facial nerve canal. Although new sequences of magnetic resonance imaging are currently being validated for visualization of the facial nerve (3D Cranio, Casselman et al, and Van Der Cruyssen et al 21 , 22 ), visualization of distal nerve branches is still not possible in this preoperative static imaging modality. Further studies will need to determine the preferred facial nerve imaging modalities.…”