2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11770-015-0491-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D density inversion of gravity gradient data using the extrapolated Tikhonov regularization

Abstract: We use the extrapolated Tikhonov regularization to deal with the ill-posed problem of 3D density inversion of gravity gradient data. The use of regularization parameters in the proposed method reduces the deviations between calculated and observed data. We also use the depth weighting function based on the eigenvector of gravity gradient tensor to eliminate undesired effects owing to the fast attenuation of the position function. Model data suggest that the extrapolated Tikhonov regularization in conjunction w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Commer [12] proposed a depth-weighting function based on the depth of the top surface of the geological body, which could obtain accurate inversion results. This function was improved to be more accurate in recognizing the range of preset parameters and the location of the filed sources [13]. Imposing hard constraints on physical bounds is essential to recovering a geologically plausible model [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commer [12] proposed a depth-weighting function based on the depth of the top surface of the geological body, which could obtain accurate inversion results. This function was improved to be more accurate in recognizing the range of preset parameters and the location of the filed sources [13]. Imposing hard constraints on physical bounds is essential to recovering a geologically plausible model [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, by analyzing the gradient of objective functional, we find that the distribution of density is related to the conventional gradient formulation of objective functional. Subsequently, two mechanisms of depth weighting are compared and analyzed in detail: (1) a regularization-based strategy: applying a depth weighting to the regularization term [9,11,14,16]; and (2) gradient-based strategy: applying a depth weighting to the gradient of data misfit [21,22]. The comparative analysis indicates that the second method would improve gravity depth resolution more directly and effectively, and this improvement is less influenced by regularization parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhdanov and Lin proposed an adaptive polynomial inversion based on a regularized conjugate gradient inversion method and achieved suitable results [35]. Liu proposed a joint density inversion for gravity gradient data based on the Tikhonov regularization method [36]. The structure constrained joint inversion method is mostly based on cross-gradient function, which is an effective method for the joint inversion of different geophysical data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%