2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D die shape optimisation for net-shape forging of aerofoil blades

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen in the table, the thickness and overall forging errors show strong correlation with all process parameters including friction coefficient, initial temperature of the workpiece, and die stroke, whereas the deviation error shows weak correlation with the process parameters. This result is consistent with the observation drawn in references [13] and [14] that the thickness error is largely affected in the forging step while the deviation error is mainly resulted from material springback and thermal distortion in the unloading and cooling steps. Concerning the effect of the process parameters on the overall forging error, it can be found that both the die stroke and the initial temperature of the workpiece have a bigger effect on the overall forging error than the friction coefficient.…”
Section: Stochastic Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As can be seen in the table, the thickness and overall forging errors show strong correlation with all process parameters including friction coefficient, initial temperature of the workpiece, and die stroke, whereas the deviation error shows weak correlation with the process parameters. This result is consistent with the observation drawn in references [13] and [14] that the thickness error is largely affected in the forging step while the deviation error is mainly resulted from material springback and thermal distortion in the unloading and cooling steps. Concerning the effect of the process parameters on the overall forging error, it can be found that both the die stroke and the initial temperature of the workpiece have a bigger effect on the overall forging error than the friction coefficient.…”
Section: Stochastic Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…1. To directly correlate FE simulation results with CMM measurement data in production, the forging errors can be further quantified as thickness and deviation errors using the following equations [14] (1a) only defines a half of the thickness error as this is a convenient way to equally split the total thickness error to the top and bottom halves of the aerofoil sections for easy calculation of the surface discrepancies between the actual and nominal aerofoil surfaces. This allows easy quantification of aerofoil surface deviations and die shape modification for reduced forging errors.…”
Section: Quantification Of Blade Forging Errors: Thickness and Deviationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Os métodos numéricos mostram com bastante exatidão valores de deformações equivalentes e tensões nas direções principais em regiões específicas [9].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified