2015
DOI: 10.1007/jhep02(2015)024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3d duality with adjoint matter from 4d duality

Abstract: Abstract:We study the Seiberg dualities with an adjoint matter for the U(N) and the SU(N) gauge groups in three-and four-dimensions with four supercharges. The relation between three-and four-dimensional dualities is investigated. We derive the threedimensional duality from four-dimensional one by the dimensional reduction including the non-perturbative effect of the S 1 -compactification. In the U(N) case, we obtain the KimPark duality which is known as a generalization of the Aharony duality to including an … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the singlets and the peculiar superpotential, the qualitative behavior of the T IR is quite different from the case of adjoint-SQCD with W = Tr(φ h ) studied in the literature [26][27][28][29][30][31], both in 4d and in 3d.…”
Section: Quiver Diagramsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Because of the singlets and the peculiar superpotential, the qualitative behavior of the T IR is quite different from the case of adjoint-SQCD with W = Tr(φ h ) studied in the literature [26][27][28][29][30][31], both in 4d and in 3d.…”
Section: Quiver Diagramsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…SU (2) with 1 flavor in 3d is described by a quantum modified moduli space [15] M SU (2) tr(qq) = 1 (where M SU (2) is the basic monopole with GNO charges {+1, −1}), which is inconsistent with the F-terms of α 0 . No monopole superpotential is generated compactifying on S 1 , since the only superpotential term that can soak up the zero modes of the adjoint field φ is β 2 tr(φ 2 ), generating β 2 M SU (2) [19]. But a term β 2 M SU (2) does not satisfy the chiral ring stability criterion.…”
Section: Down To 3d: Abelianizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We discuss this issue in detail in section 5. Compactifying our theory to 3d, a monopole superpotential is generated, similarly to [16] (the monopole has four fermion zero modes and thanks to the term β 2 Trφ 2 we can soak two of them, obtaining the superpotential term β 2 M), and the 3d compactified theory is dual to U (1) with 3 flavors N = 4. Upon dropping by hand the monopole superpotential term, the resulting 3d theory is dual to U (1) with 3 flavors N = 2 with a peculiar superpotential.…”
Section: (A 1 D 4 ) In 4 Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%